Search J Rheum

Advanced Search

Home

Current Issue

Archives

Guidelines for Authors

Classified Ads

Links

Subscriptions

Subscriber Registration

Guidelines for Website Users

E-mail Alert Service

Contact Info

Patient Based Method of Assessing Adverse Events in Clinical Trials in Rheumatology: the Revised Stanford Toxicity Index

VIVIAN WELCH, GURKIRPAL SINGH, VIBEKE STRAND, JIM FRIES, MAARTEN BOERS, DENA RAMEY, RICHARD O. DAY, PETER BROOKS, PETER TUGWELL, JENNIFER CLINCH, and BETSY KRISTJANSSON

ABSTRACT.

We describe the progress towards developing a patient rated toxicity index that meets all of the patient-important attributes defined by the OMERACT Drug Safety Working Party. These attributes are frequency, severity, importance to patient, importance to the clinician, impact on economics, impact on activities, and integration of adverse effects with benefits. The Stanford Toxicity Index (STI) has been revised to collect all attributes with the exception of impact on activities. However, since the STI is a part of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), impact on activities is collected by the HAQ. In particular, a new question asks patients to rate overall satisfaction, taking into consideration both benefits and adverse effects. The next step in the development of this tool is to ensure that the STI meets the OMERACT filter of truth, discrimination, and feasibility. Although truth and feasibility have been confirmed by comparisons within the ARAMIS database, discrimination needs to be assessed in clinical trials. (J Rheumatol 2001;28:1188-91)

Key Indexing Terms:

CLINICAL IMPORTANCE
TOXICITY
PATIENT RATINGS
QUESTIONNAIRE
ADVERSE EVENTS



Return to May 2001 Table of Contents



© 2001. The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited.
All rights reserved.