Search J Rheum

Advanced Search

Home

Current Issue

Archives

Guidelines for Authors

Classified Ads

Links

Search PubMed

Subscriptions

Subscriber Registration

Guidelines for Website Users

JRheum Update Service

Contact Info

Defining Lupus Cases for Clinical Studies: The Boston Weighted Criteria for the Classification of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

KAREN H. COSTENBADER, ELIZABETH W. KARLSON, MATTHEW H. LIANG, and LISA A. MANDL

ABSTRACT.

Objective.
The 1982 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), updated in 1997, have become the standard for establishing eligibility of subjects for epidemiologic and clinical lupus studies. These criteria may exclude patients with limited disease, restricting the generalizability of research findings. We developed and evaluated the ability of a weighted classification system to identify a broader spectrum of patients with lupus.

Methods. We constructed the Boston Weighted Criteria system for the classification of SLE, updating that developed in 1984. Using a hospital billing database, we identified 27l patients seen in our rheumatology clinic for possible SLE and reviewed medical records for all ACR criteria and the treating rheumatologist's diagnosis. We compared both the Boston Criteria and the treating rheumatologist's diagnosis to the updated 1982 ACR criteria; we also compared the Boston Criteria to the treating rheumatologist's diagnosis.

Results. The Boston Criteria identified 190/271 patients as having SLE, the rheumatologist's diagnosis identified 179/271, and the ACR criteria identified 171/271. The Boston Criteria had a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 69% compared to the ACR criteria, and would identify 7% more patients.

Conclusion. The Boston Criteria identify a larger number of patients compared with the current ACR criteria, while retaining face validity. This reflects the inclusion of patients with objective findings of SLE but less than 4 ACR criteria. Our Boston Criteria system could minimize selection bias and increase the generalizability of clinical SLE studies. (J Rheumatol 2002;29:2545-50)

Key Indexing Terms:

LUPUS WEIGHTED CRITERIA
CLINICAL STUDIES


From the Robert B. Brigham Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disease Clinical Research Center; the Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital; and the Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Dr. Costenbader is supported by NIH training grant T32-AR07258-23 and a grant from the Arthritis National Research Foundation. Drs. Karlson and Liang are supported by NIH Grant P01AR36308 and K08AR02074-0. Dr. Karlson is also the recipient of an Arthritis Investigator Award from the Arthritis Foundation. Dr. Mandl is the recipient of a Clinical Investigator Fellowship Award from the American College of Rheumatology.

K.H. Costenbader, MD, Fellow in Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital; E.W. Karlson, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital; M.H. Liang, MD, MPH, Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Professor of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital; L.A. Mandl, MD, MPH, FRCPC, Instructor in Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital.

Address reprint requests to Dr. K.H. Costenbader, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114.

Submitted November 30, 2001; revision accepted June 13, 2002.




Return to December 2002 Table of Contents



© 2002. The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited.
All rights reserved.