Search J Rheum

Advanced Search

Home

Current Issue

Archives

Guidelines for Authors

Classified Ads

Links

Search PubMed

Subscriptions

Subscriber Registration

Guidelines for Website Users

JRheum Update Service

Contact Info

Most Patients Receiving Routine Care for Rheumatoid Arthritis in 2001 Did Not Meet Inclusion Criteria for Most Recent Clinical Trials or American College of Rheumatology Criteria for Remission

TUULIKKI SOKKA and THEODORE PINCUS

ABSTRACT.

Objective. To determine the proportion of 2 cohorts of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Nashville, Tennessee, who met 4 common criteria for inclusion in clinical trials: ³ 6 swollen joints, ³ 6 tender joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate ³ 28 mm/h, and/or morning stiffness ³ 45 min.

Methods. Two cohorts of patients with RA, all of whom had met American Rheumatism Association (ARA) [now American College of Rheumatology (ACR)] criteria for RA at some time, were studied. Cohort L (late) included 146 consecutive patients whose mean disease duration was 14.0 years and who had been under care at a weekly academic rheumatology clinic for a mean of 6.2 years when seen in 1998–2001. Cohort E (early) included 232 patients of 5 private practice rheumatologists whose symptoms began in 1998 or later and whose mean disease duration was 1.8 years when seen in 2001. Patients were reviewed for the 4 inclusion criteria as well as 6 ARA remission criteria.

Results. In Cohort L, on a 28 joint count, 42.5% of patients had ³ 6 swollen joints, 25.3% had ³ 6 tender joints, 19.9% had both ³ 6 swollen and ³ 6 tender joints, 25.0% had ESR ³ 28, and 45.9% had morning stiffness ³ 45 min. In Cohort E, on a 42 joint count, 63.4% of patients had ³ 6 swollen joints, 50.4% had ³ 6 tender joints, 38.8% had both ³ 6 swollen and ³ 6 tender joints, 49.3% had ESR ³ 28, and 50.9% had morning stiffness ³ 45 min. Overall, 15.3% of Cohort L and 34.1% of Cohort E patients had ³ 6 swollen and tender joints, as well as an ESR ³ 28 or morning stiffness ³ 45 min. Only 4.1% of Cohort L and no patient in Cohort E met ARA criteria for remission.

Conclusion. The majority of patients seen in routine care in these 2 cohorts did not meet criteria for inclusion in most contemporary RA clinical trials, including clinical trials sponsored by pharmaceutical companies to introduce new drugs or biological agents. Few of these patients met ARA criteria for remission. Controlled trial data are not available concerning results of treatment with new biological agents or disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in a large proportion, if not a majority, of patients with RA at this time. (J Rheumatol 2003;30:1138-46)

Key Indexing Terms:

RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
INCLUSION CRITERIA
CLINICAL TRIAL


From the Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Supported in part by grants from Aventis, Amgen, Pharmacia, the Jack C. Massey Foundation, the Academy of Finland, and by National Institutes of Health Grant HL 67964.

T. Sokka, MD, PhD, Vanderbilt University and Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland; T. Pincus, MD, Vanderbilt University.

Address reprint requests to Dr. T. Sokka, Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 203 Oxford House, Box 5, Nashville, TN 37232-4500. E-mail: tuulikki.sokka@vanderbilt.edu

Submitted June 11, 2002; revision accepted December 6, 2002.




Return to June 2003 Table of Contents



© 2003. The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited.
All rights reserved.