Search J Rheum

Advanced Search

Home

Current Issue

Archives

Guidelines for Authors

Classified Ads

Links

Search PubMed

Subscriptions

Subscriber Registration

Guidelines for Website Users

JRheum Update Service

Contact Info

Prevalence of Antibodies Against a-Fodrin in Sjögren's Syndrome: Comparison of 2 Sets of Classification Criteria

TORSTEN WITTE, TORSTEN MATTHIAS, MARTINA OPPERMANN, KLAUS HELMKE, HANS H. PETER, REINHOLD E. SCHMIDT, and MOSHE TISHLER

ABSTRACT.

Objective.
To compare the prevalence of antibodies against a-fodrin in Sjögren's syndrome (SS) classified according to San Diego and European Community Study Group (ESG) criteria.

Methods. The prevalence and mean concentrations of IgA and IgG autoantibodies against a-fodrin were determined and compared in patients with SS classified either according to San Diego criteria or to criteria of the ESG by ELISA.

Results. IgA antibodies against a-fodrin were detected in 88% and IgG antibodies against a-fodrin in 64% and either of these antibodies in 93% of 85 patients classified according to San Diego criteria. Antibodies against Ro were present in 38% of these sera. IgA antibodies against a-fodrin were detected in 61%, IgG antibodies against a-fodrin in 51%, and any of these antibodies in 73% of 51 patients classified according to the ESG criteria. The mean concentrations of both IgA and IgG antibodies against a-fodrin that seem to correlate with disease activity were higher in patients classified according to the San Diego criteria.

Conclusion. Antibodies against a-fodrin are detectable in almost all sera obtained from patients with SS classified according to the San Diego criteria and are significantly more prevalent than antibodies against Ro. The lower prevalence of the autoantibodies in patients classified according to the ESG criteria reflects the lower specificity of these criteria for SS. (J Rheumatol 2003;30:2157-9)

Key Indexing Terms:

SJÖGREN'S SYNDROME
a-FODRIN


From the Abteilung Klinische Immunologie, Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover; Aesku.Lab Diagnostika, Wendelsheim; IV. Med. Abteilung Rheumatologie und Klin. Immunologie, Krankenhaus Bogenhausen, München-Bogenhausen, München; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg, Germany; and the Department of Medicine B, Asaf Harofe Medical Center, Zrifin, Israel.

Supported by BMFT-Projekt C2.12 (Kompetenznetz Rheuma), Deutsche Stiftung Sklerodermie, Fritz-Bender-Stiftung, Rosemarie-Germscheid-Stiftung.

T. Witte, MD; R.E. Schmidt, MD, Professor of Internal Medicine, Abteilung Klinische Immunologie, Medizinische Hochschule; T. Matthias, Managing Director, Aesku.Lab Diagnostika; M. Oppermann; K. Helmke, MD, Professor of Internal Medicine, IV. Med. Abteilung Rheumatologie und Klin. Immunologie, Krankenhaus Bogenhausen, München-Bogenhausen; H.H. Peter, MD, Professor of Internal Medicine, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität; M. Tishler, MD, Professor of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine B, Asaf Harofe Medical Center.

Address reprint requests to Dr. T. Witte, Abteilung Klinische Immunologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. E-mail: witte.torsten@mh.hannover.de

Submitted October 22, 2002; revision accepted February 27, 2003.




Return to October 2003 Table of Contents



© 2003. The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited.
All rights reserved.