Search J Rheum

Advanced Search

Home

Current Issue

Archives

Guidelines for Authors

Classified Ads

Links

Search PubMed

Subscriptions

Subscriber Registration

Guidelines for Website Users

JRheum Update Service

Contact Info

Contrast Medium in Power Doppler Ultrasound for Assessment of Synovial Vascularity: Comparison with Arthroscopy

UGO FIOCCO, FEDERICA FERRO, LUISELLA COZZI, MARISTELLA VEZZÙ, PAOLO SFRISO, CARLO CHECCHETTO, FULVIA CHIECO BIANCHI, ROBERTO NARDACCHIONE, ANTONIO PICCOLI, SILVANO TODESCO, and LEOPOLDO RUBALTELLI

ABSTRACT.

Objective.
To evaluate the reliability of contrast-unenhanced power Doppler (CUPD) and contrast-enhanced power Doppler (CEPD) ultrasound (US) assessment of synovial vascularity of knee joint synovitis by prospective comparison with the "gold standard," arthroscopy.

Methods. A total of 18 knees of 17 patients with refractory rheumatoid and psoriatic knee joint synovitis were examined by US. Recognition of PD synovial vessel flow and its spatial arrangement in relation to the pannus/cartilage interface (P/CI) or fluid/synovium interface (F/SI) were studied by CUPD- and CEPD–US after a single intravenous bolus of galactosel palmitic acid (Levovist). Arthroscopy video recordings were reanalyzed by computer image analysis to assess synovial vascular marking. CUPD and CEPD flow signal scores were compared with each other and with corresponding vascular marking scores. Using villous vascular marking as reference, CUPD and CEPD sensitivity and specificity were measured. Interobserver variability was evaluated.

Results. Compared with the unenhanced PD method, contrast administration increased the PD flow signal score in 13/18 knees (72.2%), allowing increased detection of F/SI PD flow signal configuration (p < 0.018) and of the coexistence of P/CI and F/SI PD imaging (p < 0.0078). With arthroscopy as reference, contrast-enhanced PD was found to be more useful than the unenhanced method, showing more reproducible PD signal scores (p = 0.05 vs p = nonsignificant), as well as higher sensitivity (80% vs 30%), but lower specificity (62% vs 87%), in the recognition of increased vascularity of synovial villi. Interobserver agreement was 100%.

Conclusion. The prospective comparison with arthroscopy showed the reliability of the CEPD method in synovial vessel recognition and its potential clinical usefulness in assessment of knee joint synovitis. (J Rheumatol 2003;30:2170-6)

Key Indexing Terms:

CONTRAST-ENHANCED POWER DOPPLER ULTRASOUND
SYNOVITIS
ARTHROSCOPY


From the Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, and Institute of Radiology, University of Padova, Padova; and the Knee Joint Surgery Unit, Abano Terme Hospital, Abano Terme, Italy.

U. Fiocco, MD; L. Cozzi, MD; M. Vezzù, MD; P. Sfriso, MD; C. Checchetto, MD; F. Chieco Bianchi, MD; A. Piccoli, MD, DS; S. Todesco, MD, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Padova; F. Ferro, MD; L. Rubaltelli, MD, Institute of Radiology, University of Padova; R. Nardacchione, MD, Knee Joint Surgery Unit, Abano Terme Hospital.

Address reprint requests to Dr. U. Fiocco, Cattedra e Divisione di Reumatologia, Università di Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy.

Submitted October 28, 2002; revision accepted February 3, 2003.




Return to October 2003 Table of Contents



© 2003. The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited.
All rights reserved.