Search J Rheum

Advanced Search

Home

Current Issue

Archives

Guidelines for Authors

Classified Ads

Links

Search PubMed

Subscriptions

Subscriber Registration

Guidelines for Website Users

JRheum Update Service

Contact Info

Radiological Scoring Methods in Ankylosing Spondylitis. Reliability and Change Over 1 and 2 Years

ANNEKE SPOORENBERG, KURT de VLAM, SJEF van der LINDEN, MAXIME DOUGADOS, HERMAN MIELANTS, HILLE van de TEMPEL, and DÉSIRÉE van der HEIJDE

ABSTRACT.

Objective.
To compare reliability and change over time of radiological scoring methods in ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods. Two trained observers scored 217 sets of radiographs from baseline and from one and 2 years' followup. Sacroiliac (SI) joints were grade 0–4 by the New York method and Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (SASSS). Hips and cervical and lumbar spine were graded 0–4 by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index (BASRI). BASRI spinal scores and New York SI are combined into BASRI-spine (score 2–12) and with the addition of BASRI-hips into BASRI-total (2–16). Cervical and lumbar spine were also scored in detail (SASSS, 0–36 each) and were combined into SASSS-total or "modified" SASSS (both range 0–72). To assess change a smallest detectable difference (SDD) was estimated for data on a quasi-interval scale.

Results. The SI scoring methods showed intra and interobserver kappa between 0.36 and 0.70. The BASRI-hip reached kappa between 0.59 and 0.84. Combined SASSS scores were most reliable, with intra and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between 0.90 and 0.96. The ICC of the combined BASRI scores were also very good, ranging from 0.85 to 0.95. For SI New York, SI SASSS, and BASRI-hip, 0.3–1.2% of patients deteriorated 1 grade; 7.5% deteriorated 1 grade (6.3% of maximum score) in BASRI-spine and BASRI-total, and observers agreed in up to 48% of the cases that no change occurred. The SDD was lowest (7.5; 10% of maximum score) for "modified" SASSS. Only 0.8% of patients deteriorated more than the SDD and observers agreed in up to 92% of the cases that no change occurred.

Conclusion. Radiological scoring methods for AS are moderately to excellently reliable. Under the selected scoring conditions (concealed time order, average of 2 observers, SDD based on interobserver data, unselected patient population) there was too little change over 2 years to be detected reliably by the scoring methods. (J Rheumatol 2004;31:125-32)

Key Indexing Terms:

RADIOLOGY
OUTCOME
BATH ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS RADIOLOGY INDEX
STOKE ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS SPINE SCORE
ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS


From the University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands; University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium; Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France; Maasland Hospital, Sittard, The Netherlands; and Limburg University Center, Diepenbeek, Belgium.

A. Spoorenberg, MD, Rheumatologist; S. van der Linden, MD, PhD, Professor in Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht; K. de Vlam, MD, PhD, Rheumatologist; H. Mielants, MD, PhD, Professor in Rheumatology, University Hospital Gent; M. Dougados, MD, PhD, Professor in Rheumatology, Hôpital Cochin; H. van de Tempel, MD, Rheumatologist, Maasland Hospital; D.M.F.M. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Professor in Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, Limburg University Center.

Address reprint requests to Dr. D.M.F.M. van der Heijde, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. E-mail: dhe@sint.azm.nl

Submitted June 12, 2002; revision accepted June 10, 2003.




Return to January 2004 Table of Contents



© 2004. The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited.
All rights reserved.