Search J Rheum

Advanced Search

Home

Current Issue

Archives

Guidelines for Authors

Classified Ads

Links

Search PubMed

Subscriptions

Subscriber Registration

Guidelines for Website Users

JRheum Update Service

Contact Info


Read Full Text


Download PDF


View Table of Contents

Measuring the Outcome of Health Resort Programs

MARTIN WEIGL, THOMAS EWERT, JUERGEN KLEINSCHMIDT, and GEROLD STUCKI

ABSTRACT.

Objective
. To evaluate the metric properties and practicability of valid, internationally available outcome instruments in the special setting of health resort programs.

Methods. A cohort study in a convenience sample of patients with low back pain, upper back pain, conditions of the lower extremities, and conditions of the upper extremities was conducted. Their functioning and health were assessed before and after a health resort program by the disease-specific North American Spine Society (NASS) instruments Lumbar NASS and Cervical NASS; WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index; Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire; and the general instrument, Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 (SF-36).

Results. Completeness on the scale level ranged between 1% and 10%. Criterion validity of condition-specific instruments was confirmed by stronger associations of the pain and function scales to the Physical Health component of the SF-36 (r = –0.59 to –0.79, p < 0.001 for all scales) than to the Mental Health component (r = –0.11, NS, to r = –0.42, p < 0.001). Reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficient) was higher than 0.8 for all scales of condition-specific instruments and for 6 of 8 SF-36 scales. Floor and ceiling effects ranged between 0% and 7%. The condition-specific instruments demonstrated a good responsiveness with an effect size ranging between 0.28 and 0.55 and with a standardized response mean between 0.32 and 0.94. The responsiveness of most SF-36 scales was similar, but the Physical Function scale showed a lower responsiveness than the condition-specific scales.

Conclusion. The evaluated instruments can be recommended for use in clinical trials that assess the outcome of health resort programs. (J Rheumatol 2006;33:764–70)

 

Key Indexing Terms:

BALNEOLOGY
EXERCISE THERAPY
MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES
HEALTH RESORTS
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE)
QUALITY OF LIFE


From the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; and the Institute for Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (former Institute of Medical Balneology and Climatology), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Supported by the Bayerischer Heilbäderverband (BHV; Bavarian Spa Association); the municipalities and spa administrations of Bad Füssing, Bad Wörishofen, and Bad Kissingen; and the Sebastian Kneipp Institut GmbH.

M. Weigl, MD, MPH; T. Ewert, MA, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich; J. Kleinschmidt, PhD, Institute for Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich; G. Stucki, MD, MS, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Institute for Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich.

Address reprint requests to Prof. G. Stucki, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany. E-mail: gerold.stucki@med.uni-muenchen.de

Accepted for publication November 23, 2005.



Return to April 2006 Table of Contents



© 2006. The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited.
All rights reserved.