Search J Rheum

Advanced Search

Home

Current Issue

Archives

Guidelines for Authors

Classified Ads

Links

Search PubMed

Subscriptions

Subscriber Registration

Guidelines for Website Users

JRheum Update Service

Contact Info


Read Full Text


Download PDF


View Table of Contents

Measuring Dactylitis in Clinical Trials: Which Is the Best Instrument to Use?

PAUL J. HEALY and PHILIP S. HELLIWELL

ABSTRACT.

Objective.
Until recently there were no validated tools to assess and measure dactylitis, but a quasi-objective measure of dactylitis (the Leeds Dactylitis Index, LDI, and a simplified version, the LDI basic) has now been developed. We undertook an open-label observational trial to test the responsiveness of the LDI and other measures previously used in clinical trials.

Methods. Twenty-eight patients with a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (as defined by the new ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis, CASPAR) and active disease including new-onset dactylitis were enrolled. The patients underwent clinical assessment at baseline, 2 weeks, and 1, 3 and 6 months after change of disease modifying therapy, usually to methotrexate. Comparator dactylitis tools were taken from the literature and denoted IMPACT1 (Infliximab Multinational Psoriatic Arthritis Controlled Trial), Clegg, and Salvarani.

Results. All 5 measures of dactylitis showed significant change from baseline and a large effect size (effect sizes first to last clinic visit: LDI 0.99, LDI basic 0.9, IMPACT1 1.63, Clegg 0.77, Salvarani 1.27). The correlation with clinical measures was strongest for the IMPACT1 score, but all the indices except Clegg had a significant positive relationship with tender joint counts, swollen joint counts, Disease Activity Score 28, and patient and physician global measures. When considering the 5 measures of dactylitis within the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology [Clinical Trials] filter, the LDI and the LDI basic showed the best overall fit for the domains of truth, discrimination, and feasibility.

Conclusion. With the important points in its development examined, the LDI is now ready to be used in larger randomized controlled trials both as an outcome measure and to allow further assessment of its utility. (First Release Feb 15 2007; J Rheumatol 2007;34:1302-6)

Key Indexing Terms:

PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS
DACTYLITIS
MEASUREMENT


From the Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

P. Healy was supported by a scholarship from the Rose Hellaby Trust, New Zealand. Support for the study was provided by the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) and an unrestricted grant from Sanofi-Aventis.

P.J. Healy, MBChB, FRACP, Rose Hellaby Research Fellow; P.S. Helliwell, DM, PhD, FRCP, Senior Lecturer in Rheumatology, Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds.

Address reprint requests to Dr. P.S. Helliwell, Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 36 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9NZ, UK. E-mail: p.helliwell@leeds.ac.uk

Accepted for publication December 20, 2006.




Return to June 2007 Table of Contents



© 2007. The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited.
All rights reserved.