![]() |
|
The Clinical Utility of Computed Tomography Compared to Conventional Radiography in
Diagnosing Sacroiliitis. A Retrospective Study
on 910 Patients and Literature Review
MATS GEIJER, GRO GADEHOLT GÖTHLIN, and JAN H. GÖTHLIN
ABSTRACT. Methods. In a retrospective study of clinical data, we evaluated 910 patients with AS who were examined by radiography and CT within a 2-year period. The reported outcomes from radiography and CT were compared. Results. The agreement between radiography and CT data was only fair, with a kappa value of 0.2418. There were 35.0% false-positive radiography reports, 22.5% false-negative radiography reports, and 86.0% false-equivocal radiography reports. In total, 41.3% of all radiological reports gave a false answer. While the number of false negatives was similar to that previously reported, the number of false positives was much higher than previously reported, and is probably similar to everyday radiology reporting. Conclusion. Our results indicate that the clinical utility of radiography for evaluation of sacroiliitis is limited. The high rate of inaccurate results should motivate the use of sectional imaging for its superior performance. (First Release June 15 2007; J Rheumatol 2007;34:1561-5) Key Indexing Terms:
SPONDYLOARTHROPATHIES
From the Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. M. Geijer, MD; G.G. Göthlin, MD, PhD; J.H. Göthlin, MD, PhD. Address reprint requests to Dr. M. Geijer, Department of Radiology, Lund University Hospital, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden. E-mail: mats@geijer.info Accepted for publication March 19, 2007. |