Search J Rheum

Advanced Search

Home

Current Issue

Archives

Guidelines for Authors

Classified Ads

Links

Search PubMed

Subscriptions

Subscriber Registration

Guidelines for Website Users

JRheum Update Service

Contact Info


Read Full Text


Download PDF


View Table of Contents

Clinical Manifestations of Human T Lymphotropic Virus Type I-Infected Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

MASAKI AKIMOTO, KAKUSHI MATSUSHITA, YUKIO SURUGA, NORIKO AOKI, ATSUO OZAKI, KIMIHARU UOZUMI, CHUWA TEI, and NAOMICHI ARIMA

ABSTRACT.

Objective.
Human T lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) may be associated with some connective tissue autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). To determine the relationship between HTLV-I infection and SLE, we examined the clinical manifestations of SLE patients with HTLV-I infection.

Methods. Eighty-nine patients with SLE were screened for antibodies to HTLV-I by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. The presence of HTLV-I proviral sequences in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) quantification and Southern blotting analysis. The differences in clinical manifestations between HTLV-I-seropositive and seronegative patients with SLE were analyzed statistically.

Results. Fourteen of 89 (15.7%) patients were HTLV-I seropositive. All PBMC samples from 11 patients tested by PCR and 3 samples from 10 patients tested by Southern blotting analysis were positive for HTLV-I-related sequences. The age of HTLV-I-seropositive patients with SLE was significantly higher than that of seronegative patients (median 60 vs 42 yrs; p < 0.0005). The age at onset of SLE in HTLV-I-seropositive patients was also significantly higher than that of seronegative patients (median 45.5 vs 30 yrs; p < 0.0005). The lymphocyte count in HTLV-I-seropositive SLE patients was significantly higher than that of seronegative patients (median 1740 vs 1066/µl; p = 0.027). The maintenance dose of prednisolone in HTLV-I-seropositive patients with SLE was significantly lower than that in seronegative patients (median 5 vs 9 mg/day; p = 0.012).

Conclusion. This is the first report of the differences in clinical manifestations between SLE patients with and without HTLV-I infection. Our results suggest some involvement of HTLV-I in the pathogenesis of SLE. (First Release August 1 2007; J Rheumatol 2007;34:1841-8)

Key Indexing Terms:

HUMAN T LYMPHOTROPIC VIRUS TYPE I
SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS


From the Department of Hematology and Immunology, Kagoshima University Hospital; and the Division of Host Response, Center for Chronic Viral Diseases, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.

M. Akimoto, MD; K. Matsushita, MD; Y. Suruga, MD; N. Aoki, MD; A. Ozaki, MD, Department of Hematology and Immunology, Kagoshima University Hospital; K. Uozumi, MD, Assistant Professor; N. Arima, MD, Professor, Division of Host Response, Center for Chronic Viral Diseases, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences; C. Tei, MD, Professor, Department of Cardiovascular, Respiratory and Metabolic Medicine, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences.

Address reprint requests to Dr. M. Akimoto, Department of Hematology and Immunology, Kagoshima University Hospital, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan. E-mail: akimoto@m3.kufm.kagoshima-u.ac.jp

Accepted for publication May 3, 2007.




Return to September 2007 Table of Contents



© 2007. The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited.
All rights reserved.