Search the Journal

Home

Current Issue

Archives

Guidelines for Authors & Reviewers

Classified Ads

Links

Search PubMed

Subscriptions

Subscriber Registration

Guidelines for Website Users

JRheum Update Service

Contact Info


Download PDF


View Table of Contents

The Minimally Important Difference for the Health Assessment Questionnaire in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Practice Is Smaller Than in Randomized Controlled Trials

JANET E. POPE, DINESH KHANNA, DEBORAH NORRIE, and JANINE M. OUIMET

ABSTRACT.

Objective. Patient-reported outcomes are used in clinical practice and trials. We studied a large clinical practice to determine the minimally important difference (MID) estimates for (1) the Health Assessment Questionnaire–Damage Index (HAQ-DI): improvement and worsening using patient global assessment anchor; and (2) pain using a patient-reported pain anchor.

Methods. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA; N = 225) had clinic visits at 2 timepoints within 1 year, completed the HAQ-DI and pain visual analog scale (VAS; 0–100 mm), and answered the question, “How would you describe your overall status/overall pain since the last visit?”, as much worsened, somewhat worsened, the same, somewhat improved, or much improved. If rated as somewhat improved or worsened, they were defined as the minimally changed subgroups.

Results. Eighty-three percent were women, mean age 60 years, with disease duration 11.7 ± 10.7 years. The baseline HAQ-DI was 0.97 ± SD 0.76, and at followup 1.0 ± 0.77 (mean change +0.03 ± 0.40). The baseline pain VAS was 42.3 ± 28.8, and at followup 38.5 ± 27.9 (mean change –2.8 ± 25.9). The mean (SD) HAQ-DI change score was –0.09 (0.42) for somewhat improved and 0.15 (0.33) for somewhat worsened. The HAQ-DI change for somewhat/much better was –0.20 ± 0.52, and for somewhat/much worse +0.21 ± 0.33. For pain, somewhat improved changed by –11.9 mm on the VAS, and somewhat worsened by 6.8 mm. Estimates for HAQ-DI and pain were larger than the for no-change group, 0.03 (0.32) and –3.2 (20.9).

Conclusion. The MID for HAQ-DI in clinical practice is smaller than it is in trials. This may have implications for observational studies and clinical care. (J Rheumatol First Release Dec 15 2008; doi:10.3899/jrheum.080479)

Key Indexing Terms:

MINIMALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE
HEALTH ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE-DISABILITY INDEX
RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS


From the Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada; St. Joseph’s Health Centre, London, Canada; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; and Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

D. Norrie was supported by an unrestricted research grant from the Department of Medicine, the University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

J.E. Pope, MD, MPH, FRCPC, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario,; D. Khanna, MD, MSc, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, and Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles; D. Norrie; J. Ouimet, MSc, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario.

Address reprint requests to Dr. J. Pope, St. Joseph’s Health Care, 268 Grosvenor Street, PO Box 5777, London, Ontario N6A 4V2.
Accepted for publication September 18, 2008.


Return to First Release Table of Contents



© The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited.
All rights reserved.