Search J Rheum

Advanced Search

Home

Current Issue

Archives

Guidelines for Authors & Reviewers

Classified Ads

Links

Search PubMed

Subscriptions

Subscriber Registration

Guidelines for Website Users

JRheum Update Service

Contact Info


Read Full Text


Download PDF


View Table of Contents

Bone Scanning of Limited Value for Diagnosis of Symptomatic Oligofocal and Multifocal Osteonecrosis

MICHAEL A. MONT, SLIF D. ULRICH, THORSTEN M. SEYLER, JONATHAN M. SMITH, DAVID R. MARKER, MIKE S. McGRATH, DAVID S. HUNGERFORD, and LYNNE C. JONES

ABSTRACT.

Objective.
Bone scintigraphy has been advocated as a useful diagnostic tool for patients with suspected osteonecrosis or in screening for multifocal disease. We evaluated the sensitivity of bone scanning relative to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of osteonecrosis.

Methods. Forty-eight patients presented with suspected osteonecrosis of the shoulder, hip, knee, or ankle. All patients underwent simultaneous (< 3 months apart) bone scans and MRI studies as part of diagnostic investigations. Histological confirmation of osteonecrosis was obtained for all suspected lesions. The diagnostic result for each imaging modality was then assessed and compared.

Results. All 163 (100%) histologically confirmed lesions were identified by MRI, while only 91 lesions (56%) were identified by bone scan. There was complete congruency of bone scans with MR images in only 38% of patients (18/48). Bone scanning identified 72% of lesions (47/65) in oligofocal patients (≤ 2 joints involved) compared with 45% of the lesions (44/98) in multifocal patients (≥ 3 joints involved). Sensitivity of lesions was highest for the knee and hip and lower for the shoulder and ankle. Larger and later-stage lesions had a higher bone scan sensitivity.

Conclusion. Our results demonstrated the low sensitivity of bone scintigraphy for diagnosing symptomatic osteonecrosis. It is least sensitive for early-stage lesions where it might be most useful to diagnose the disease. Our study also confirms that this test is less sensitive for joints other than the hip and is also not useful as a screening tool. Our study does not support the use of bone scans as a diagnostic or screening tool for osteonecrosis. (First Release June 1 2008; J Rheumatol 2008; 35:1629–34)

Key Indexing Terms:

OSTEONECROSIS
BONE SCAN
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
AVASCULAR NECROSIS
OUTCOME
DIAGNOSIS


From the Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Center for Joint Preservation and Reconstruction, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore; Good Samaritan Hospital, Orthopaedics Division, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

M.A. Mont, MD, Director; J.M. Smith, BS, Graduate Student; D.R. Marker, BS, Graduate Student; M.S. McGrath, MD, Fellow; T.M. Seyler, MD, Fellow; S.D. Ulrich, MD, Fellow, Center for Joint Preservation and Reconstruction, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore; L.C. Jones, PhD, Professor; D.R. Hungerford, MD, Professor, Good Samaritan Hospital, Orthopaedics Division, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution.

Dr. Mont and Dr. Ulrich contributed equally to this work.

Address reprint requests to Dr. M.A. Mont, Rubin Institute of Advanced Orthopedics, Center for Joint Preservation and Reconstruction, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, 2401 West Belvedere Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21215. E-mail: Sulrich@lifebridgehealth.org

Accepted for publication March 12, 2008.




Return to August 2008 Table of Contents



© The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited.
All rights reserved.