Search J Rheum

Advanced Search

Home

Current Issue

Archives

Guidelines for Authors & Reviewers

Classified Ads

Links

Search PubMed

Subscriptions

Subscriber Registration

Guidelines for Website Users

JRheum Update Service

Contact Info


Read Full Text


Download PDF


View Table of Contents

Relative Efficiencies of Physician/Assessor Global Estimates and Patient Questionnaire Measures Are Similar to or Greater Than Joint Counts to Distinguish Adalimumab from Control Treatments in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials

THEODORE PINCUS, INGRID AMARA, OSCAR G. SEGURADO, MARTIN BERGMAN, and GARY G. KOCH

ABSTRACT.

Objective.
To estimate relative efficiencies of the 7 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) Core Data Set measures to distinguish adalimumab from control treatments in 4 clinical trials.

Methods. Four adalimumab clinical trials were analyzed for arithmetic and percentage changes for each Core Data Set measure from baseline to endpoint: 3 assessor/physician measures — swollen joints, tender joints, and global estimate; 1 laboratory test — C-reactive protein; and 3 patient measures — physical function, pain, and global estimate. Relative efficiencies of each measure to distinguish adalimumab from control group responses were assessed, with tender joint count as the referent measure.

Results. Relative efficiencies were in a similar range for physician/assessor, patient, and laboratory measures, with some variation between trials. Among physician/assessor measures, relative efficiencies for global estimates were greater than for swollen and tender joint counts in 8/8 comparisons. Among patient measures, relative efficiencies for global estimates were greater than for physical function and pain scores in at least 6/8 comparisons. Among all measures, relative efficiencies for patient global estimates were greater than for swollen joint counts in 5/8 comparisons, and for tender joint counts in 8/8 comparisons.

Conclusion. Patient and physician/assessor measures distinguished adalimumab from control treatment groups in similar ranges. Among all measures, physician/assessor global estimate was most efficient, and tender joint count least efficient, in all 4 trials. This information suggests that while joint counts are the most specific measure to assess RA, their sensitivity to detect treatment effects in patients with RA is generally no greater, and usually less, than other measures. (First Release Nov 15 2007; J Rheumatol 2008;35:201-5)

Key Indexing Terms:

QUESTIONNAIRES
RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
ADALIMUMAB
PATIENT INDEX


From New York University–Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York; Quintiles, Inc., Durham; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois; and Arthritis and Rheumatology, Taylor Hospital, Ridley Park, Pennsylvania, USA.

Supported in part by grants from the Arthritis Foundation, the Jack C. Massey Foundation, and Abbott.

T. Pincus, MD, NYU-Hospital for Joint Diseases; I. Amara, DrPH, Quintiles, Inc.; O.G. Segurado, MD, PhD, Abbott; M. Bergman, MD, Arthritis and Rheumatology, Taylor Hospital; G.G. Koch, PhD, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Address reprint requests to Dr. T. Pincus, NYU-Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 East 17 Street, New York, NY 10003.

Accepted for publication August 9, 2007.




Return to February 2008 Table of Contents



© The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited.
All rights reserved.