Search J Rheum

Advanced Search

Home

Current Issue

Archives

Guidelines for Authors

Classified Ads

Links

Search PubMed

Subscriptions

Subscriber Registration

Guidelines for Website Users

JRheum Update Service

Contact Info

Editorial

2004-729.petri
Classification Criteria for Antiphospholipid Syndrome: The Case for Cardiac Valvular Disease


Download PDF

View Table of Contents

MICHELLE A. PETRI, MD, MPH,
Department of Medicine–Rheumatology,
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
Suite 7500, 1830 E. Monument Street,
Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA
Address reprint requests to Dr. Petri. E-mail: mpetri@jhmi.edu

The Sapporo classification criteria for antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) were eminence- rather than evidence-based1. The most recent revision of the APS classification criteria was presented at the Taormina conference. This revision was evidence-based in that it included requirements: (1) a manifestation must be present in both the primary and secondary forms of APS; (2) it must be be proven by multiple study designs, including retrospective case-control and prospective cohort studies; (3) multiple positive studies (i.e., different research groups) must be available for each study design; and (4) the assays used must meet international criteria for validity.

Using these strict requirements for evidence-based criteria, cardiac valvular disease (thickening or vegetations) should clearly be included in APS criteria. There is a strong pathophysiologic rationale for considering cardiac valve disease as a manifestation of APS2. Multiple supportive prospective cohort studies (Table 1A) and case-control studies (Table 1B) exist. Positive associations have been found using both study designs and in both systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and non-SLE populations, meeting our criteria for inclusion in evidence-based classification criteria. However, it is necessary for valvular disease to be stringently defined as valve thickening or valve vegetations. The new series from Zavaleta, et al in this issue of The Journal found cardiac valve lesions in 71% of patients. Over the 5 year followup period, both new lesions and progression of old lesions occurred3.

Table 1A. Cardiac valve disease. Prospective cohort studies.

Table 1B. Cardiac valve disease. Case-control studies.

The APS classification criteria do not specify the pathogenetic pathways. Thrombophilia is part of APS, certainly. Recent work, however, has elucidated multiple pathogenetic mechanisms of antiphospholipid antibodies. In early pregnancy losses, interference with trophoblast invasion, not thrombosis, is key. The benefit of heparin in late fetal loss may not be due to its anticoagulant effects, but to its antiinflammatory effects4. Some neurologic manifestations of APS do not fit the mold of thrombosis, either. Chorea may represent either a metabolic or inflammatory consequence of antiphospholipid binding. Transverse myelitis is more often inflammatory (responding to corticosteroids) than thrombotic.

Is the cardiac valve disease of APS inflammatory or thrombotic? Some histologic studies5 suggest that fibrin deposits are the major findings, not inflammation. However, antibody deposition and complement components initiating valve damage have been described2, along with increased endothelial cell expression of alpha 3 beta 1 integrin6. Although one case report suggested that anticoagulation shrank valve vegetations7, a case series of 13 patients8 and the 5 year followup study of Zavaleta, et al3 did not find antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy of benefit. In our experience, a one month course of high dose corticosteroids is given, with followup 2D cardiac echocardiograms to determine the rate of corticosteroid taper, along with anticoagulation to prevent embolic strokes. Others agree that the underlying pathology is a valvulitis, responding to corticosteroids9.

Cardiac valve disease should now be included in classification criteria for APS. However, its pathogenesis may not be primarily thrombotic, nor should its initial treatment be limited to anticoagulation.

REFERENCES

Search PubMed for:

1. Wilson WA, Gharavi AE, Koike T, et al. International consensus statement on preliminary classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome: report of an international workshop. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:1309-11. [MEDLINE]

2. Lev S, Shoenfeld Y. Cardiac valvulopathy in the antiphospholipid syndrome. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2002;23:341-8. [MEDLINE]

3. Zavaleta NE, Montes RM, Soto ME, Vanzzini NA, Amigo MC. Primary antiphospholipid syndrome: a 5-year transesophageal echocardiographic follow-up study. J Rheumatol 2004;31:2402-7.

4. Girardi G, Redecha P, Salmon JE. Inhibition of complement activation: a novel mechanism for the protective effects of heparin in antiphospholipid antibody-induced pregnancy loss [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50 Suppl:S439.

5. Garcia-Torres R, Amigo MC, de la Rosa A, Moron A, Reyes PA. Valvular heart disease in primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS): clinical and morphological findings. Lupus 1996;5:56-61. [MEDLINE]

6. Afek A, Shoenfeld Y, Manor R, et al. Increased endothelial cell expression of alpha 3 beta 1 integrin in cardiac valvulopathy in the primary (Hughes) and secondary antiphospholipid syndrome. Lupus 1999;8:502-7. [MEDLINE]

7. Skyrme-Jones RA, Wardrop CA, Wiles CM, Fraser AG. Transesophageal echocardiographic demonstration of resolution of mitral vegetations after warfarin in a patient with the primary antiphospholipid syndrome. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1995;8:251-6. [MEDLINE]

8. Espinola-Zavaleta N, Vargas-Barron J, Colmenares-Galvis T, et al. Echocardiographic evaluation of patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome. Am Heart J 1999;137:973-8. [MEDLINE]

9. Nesher G, Ilany J, Rosenmann D, Abraham AS. Valvular dysfunction in antiphospholipid syndrome: prevalence, clinical features, and treatment. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1997;27:27-35. [MEDLINE]

10. Anticardiolipin antibodies and the risk of recurrent thrombo-occlusive events and death. The Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Stroke Study Group (APASS). Neurology 1997;48:91-4. [MEDLINE]

11. Tanne D, D'Olhaberriague L, Schultz LR, Salowich-Palm L, Sawaya KL, Levine SR. Anticardiolipin antibodies and their associations with cerebrovascular risk factors. Neurology 1999;52:1368-73. [MEDLINE]

12. Gentile R, Lagana B, Tubani L, Casato M, Ferri GM, Fedele F. Assessment of echocardiographic abnormalities in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: correlation with levels of antiphospholipid antibodies. Ital Heart J 2000;1:487-92. [MEDLINE]

13. Khamashta MA, Cervera R, Asherson RA, et al. Association of antibodies against phospholipids with heart valve disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet 1990;335:1541-4. [MEDLINE]

14. Jouhikainen T, Pohjola-Sintonen S, Stephansson E. Lupus anticoagulant and cardiac manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 1994;3:167-72. [MEDLINE]

15. Bouillanne O, Millaire A, de Groote P, et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of antiphospholipid antibodies in heart valve disease: a case-control study. Am Heart J 1996;132:790-5. [MEDLINE]

16. Leung W-H, Wong K-L, Lau C-P, Wong C-K, Liu H-W. Association between antiphospholipid antibodies and cardiac abnormalties in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Med 1990;89:411-9. [MEDLINE]

17. Gabrielli F, Alcini E, Di Prima MA, Mazzacurati G, Masala C. Cardiac valve involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus and primary antiphospholipid syndrome: lack of correlation with antiphospholipid antibodies. Int J Cardiol 1995;51:117-26. [MEDLINE]

18. Badui E, Solorio S, Martinez E, et al. The heart in the primary antiphospholipid syndrome. Arch Med Res 1995;26:115-20. [MEDLINE]

19. Metz D, Jolly D, Graciet-Richard J, et al. Prevalence of valvular involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus and association with antiphospholipid syndrome: a matched echocardiographic study. Cardiology 1994;85:129-36. [MEDLINE]



Return to December 2004 Table of Contents



© 2004. The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited.
All rights reserved.