Search J Rheum

Advanced Search

Home

Current Issue

Archives

Guidelines for Authors

Classified Ads

Links

Search PubMed

Subscriptions

Subscriber Registration

Guidelines for Website Users

JRheum Update Service

Contact Info


Download PDF

View Table of Contents

Relationship Between Bone Markers and Knee Cartilage Volume in Healthy Men

YUANYUAN WANG, PETER R. EBELING, FAHAD HANNA, RICHARD O'SULLIVAN, and FLAVIA M. CICUTTINI

ABSTRACT.

Objective. To determine the relationship between biochemical bone markers and knee cartilage volume and cartilage loss over 2 years; and to investigate whether bone markers are useful to predict the cartilage loss in healthy men.

Methods. Forty healthy Caucasian men (mean age 52.3 yrs) with no symptoms of osteoarthritis (OA) were recruited. Each subject had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed on his dominant knee at baseline and 2 years later. Serum level of osteocalcin (OC), urinary levels of pyridinoline (PYD) and deoxypyridinoline (DPD), and total body bone mineral content (BMC) were measured at baseline. Tibial plateau bone size was measured at baseline. Tibial cartilage volume was measured at baseline and at followup, by means of image processing.

Results. Twenty-eight men (70%) completed the longitudinal MRI component of the study. At baseline, no significant associations were observed between values of serum OC or urine PYD and DPD and tibial cartilage volume. Higher baseline serum OC level tended to be associated with a decreased rate of cartilage loss (p = 0.06); no significant association was shown between baseline urine PYD and DPD and tibial cartilage loss, after adjusting for age, body mass index, total body BMC, and tibial plateau bone size.

Conclusion. Higher baseline serum OC level tended to be associated with a decreased rate of cartilage loss, suggesting that increased bone formation may protect against tibial cartilage loss over 2 years. Studies are needed to determine the role of bone metabolism in the pathogenesis of knee OA. (J Rheumatol 2005;32:2200-4)

Key Indexing Terms:

OSTEOCALCIN
PYRIDINOLINE
DEOXYPYRIDINOLINE
CARTILAGE VOLUME
BONE MARKERS
OSTEOARTHRITIS


From the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Central and Eastern Clinical School, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne; Graduate School of Integrative Medicine, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn; Departments of Diabetes and Endocrinology, and Medicine, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville; NHMRC Centre for Clinical Research Excellence for the Study of Women's Health, Monash University and the Jean Hailes Foundation, Clayton; and the MRI Unit, Mayne Health Diagnostic Imaging Group, Epworth Hospital, Richmond, Australia.

Supported by the Arthritis Foundation of Australia and the National Health and Medical Research Council.

Y. Wang, MMed, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; P.R. Ebeling, FRACP, MD, Departments of Diabetes and Endocrinology and Medicine, University of Melbourne; F. Hanna, BSc, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; R. O'Sullivan, FRACR, MD, MRI Unit, Mayne Health Diagnostic Imaging Group; F.M. Cicuttini, FRACP, PhD, Associate Professor, Head, Chronic Diseases Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University.

Address reprint requests to Dr. F. Cicuttini, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University Central and Eastern Clinical School, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia. E-mail: flavia.cicuttini@med.monash.edu.au

Accepted for publication June 27, 2005.


A number of serum and urinary biochemical markers have been validated for assessing the rate of bone turnover1. For bone formation, one of the most specific markers is osteocalcin (OC). The most sensitive resorption markers are collagen crosslinks, including pyridinoline (PYD) and deoxypyridinoline (DPD).

An increase in serum or urine concentrations of OC, PYD, and DPD has been reported in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) compared with controls2-9, suggesting an increased rate of bone turnover in patients with OA. Most of these data were obtained from cross-sectional studies. Few studies have assessed the relationship between structural change of OA and biochemical markers. Moreover, structural severity was generally measured by change in radiological grade or joint space width. One longitudinal study showed that the one-year increase in OC was significantly associated with loss of joint space width in subjects with knee OA over 3 years10. The longitudinal Michigan Bone Health Study showed serum OC level was lower in 3-year incident cases of hand or knee OA compared with women without OA11. There are no data available on serum or urine OC, PYD, and DPD in the early, pre-OA state.

Radiography of the knee provides an indirect assessment of joint cartilage. Recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be a valid, safe, noninvasive, sensitive, and reproducible technique for measuring knee cartilage thickness12 and volume12-14 in vivo. Knee cartilage volume is also a useful method for examining healthy subjects, before the onset of knee OA15-17.

We conducted a prospective cohort study to determine the relationship between bone markers and knee cartilage volume and cartilage loss over 2 years in healthy men with no symptoms of knee OA, to investigate whether bone markers are useful to predict the cartilage loss in healthy men.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty healthy, Caucasian men aged 24–75 years with no symptoms of knee OA were recruited through advertising in newspapers, through sporting clubs, and through the hospital staff association. Exclusion criteria included history of OA or osteoporosis, previous significant knee injury requiring non-weight-bearing treatment for > 24 h or surgery (including arthroscopy), contraindication to MRI including pacemaker, metal sutures, presence of shrapnel, iron filings in the eye. The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, Australia.

Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg (shoes and bulky clothing removed) using a single pair of electronic scales. Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm (shoes removed) using a stadiometer. Body mass index (BMI; weight/height2, kg/m2) was calculated. Current total physical activity was a composite score of total amount of walking (0–4) + activity at home (0–4) + sporting activity (0–4)18. Each subject had an MRI performed on his dominant knee, defined as the lower limb from which they step off when walking, at baseline and about 2 years later.

Knees were imaged in the sagittal plane on a 1.5-Tesla whole-body MR unit (Signa Advantage Echospeed, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA) using a commercial transmit-receive extremity coil, with sequence and parameters as described15,17,19. Knee cartilage volume was measured by 2 independent observers by means of image processing on an independent work station using the software program Osiris as described15,17,19. The coefficients of variation (CV) for total, medial, and lateral tibial cartilage volume measures were 2.6%, 3.3%, and 2.0%, respectively17. Medial and lateral tibial plateau areas were determined by creating an isotropic volume from the input images. This was reformatted in the axial plane. The areas were directly measured from these images. CV were 2.3% for medial and 2.4% for lateral tibial plateau areas17. MRI scans were examined for features of OA as described20.

Early morning blood samples and first-void urine samples were collected from all subjects within 8 weeks of their MRI at baseline. Serum and urine specimens were stored at –70°C before measurement. Total urine PYD corrected for creatinine was measured after column chromatography using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The intra- and inter-assay CV were 16% and 18.7%, respectively. Total urine DPD corrected for creatinine was also measured using HPLC. The intra- and inter-assay CV were 11.6% and 13%, respectively. Serum OC was measured using a 2-site immunoradiometric assay (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Webster, TX, USA) in a single assay. The intra- and inter-assay CV were 3.1% and 5.3%, respectively. Total body bone mineral content (TBBMC) was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) using a Hologic QDR 1000 W densitometer. The CV for TBBMC was 0.6%. All laboratory results were analyzed blind to the clinical data.

Descriptive statistics for characteristics of the subjects were tabulated. Linear regression was used to examine the relationship between bone markers and knee cartilage volume at baseline, and the relationship between bone markers and cartilage loss over 2 years. Annual tibial cartilage loss was calculated as (baseline cartilage volume – followup cartilage volume)/(time between MRI scans), and also expressed as percentage loss. Initial tibial cartilage volume and tibial cartilage loss were regressed against bone markers in univariate regression analyses, and in multivariate regression models adjusting for potential confounders including age, BMI, tibial bone size, and total body BMC. A p value less than 0.05 (2-tailed) was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using the SPSS statistical package (standard version 11.5.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of the study participants are presented in Table 1. Twenty-eight men (70%) were followed by a repeated MRI on the same knee in 2.7 ± 0.2 years (range 2.5–3.0 yrs). The following were reasons for loss to followup: one died, 3 were overseas, 3 refused to participate, and 5 were not contactable. When the noncompleted subjects are compared to completed subjects for the following characteristics, no significant differences were observed: age (p = 0.79), BMI (p = 0.36), baseline tibial cartilage volume (p = 0.91), TBBMC (p = 0.15), physical activity (p = 0.33), OC (p = 0.19), PYD (p = 0.79), and DPD (p = 0.83); the exception was greater baseline tibial plateau bone size (p = 0.02).

Table 1. Characteristics of participants.

At baseline, no significant associations were observed between values of serum OC or urine PYD and DPD and tibial cartilage volume in univariate analysis, and also in multivariate analysis adjusting for age, BMI, TBBMC, and tibial plateau bone size (Table 2). Adjustment for physical activity did not alter the results (data not shown). When medial and lateral tibial cartilage volumes were analyzed separately, similar results were observed (data not shown).

Table 2. Relationship between bone markers and tibial cartilage volume (µl).

In univariate analysis, baseline bone markers studied were not associated with percentage tibial cartilage loss. In multivariate analysis, higher baseline serum OC level tended to be associated with a decreased rate of tibial cartilage loss (p = 0.06); no significant association was shown between baseline urine PYD and DPD and tibial cartilage loss, after adjusting for age, BMI, TBBMC, and tibial plateau bone size (Table 3). Adjustment for physical activity did not alter the results (data not shown). When medial and lateral tibial cartilage losses were analyzed separately, similar results were observed (data not shown).

Table 3. Relationship between bone markers and annual tibial cartilage loss (%) over 2 years.

DISCUSSION

In this prospective cohort study, we found higher baseline serum OC level tended to be associated with a decreased rate of cartilage loss in healthy men over 2 years, after adjustment for potential confounders including age, BMI, physical activity, total body bone mineral content, and tibial plateau bone size. No significant association was shown between serum OC or urine PYD and DPD levels and baseline tibial cartilage volume, independent of age, BMI, TBBMC, and tibial plateau bone size.

Markers of bone formation and resorption have been compared between subjects with OA and healthy controls. Garnero, et al reviewed several cross-sectional studies that found elevated levels of biochemical markers of bone, cartilage, and synovium in OA21. The serum OC concentration and urinary excretion of pyridinium crosslinks have been shown to be increased in patients with OA compared to controls, suggesting an increased rate of bone turnover in this condition2-9. Recent studies have shown a correlation between pyridinium crosslinks and radiographic changes in OA7,22,23. Urine pyridinium crosslinks increased in the late stages of OA (grade 3 and 4, with subchondral bone changes), suggesting that in OA these markers may mainly reflect the degradation of the bone7,22,23. In contrast, some studies have shown lower bone marker levels suggesting a systemic decrease in bone turnover11,24,25 or no significant difference22,26,27 in OA compared to controls. However, none of these studies allowed for the fact that there may be increased skeletal mass to account for the increase in crosslink excretion. Peel, et al found urinary excretion of DPD was lower in women aged 50 to 85 years with spinal OA compared with women without the disease25. Unlike previous studies, bone mass was taken into account in this study. We observed no significant associations between values of serum OC or urine PYD and DPD and tibial cartilage volume at baseline in healthy men. We also adjusted for total bone mass. Our study differed from the previous studies, which were performed in subjects with knee OA.

Few studies have examined the association between bone markers and progression of joint destruction. Bruyere, et al found that baseline biochemical markers were not correlated with 3-year percentage changes in joint space width10. However, they showed that the one-year increase in OC was significantly correlated with 3-year progression in joint space narrowing in knee OA. In contrast, we found that higher baseline serum OC level tended to be associated with a decreased rate of cartilage loss. Bone turnover has been assessed by measuring serum OC (bone formation) and urinary pyridinium crosslinks (bone resorption). Osteocalcin or bone Gla protein, a vitamin K-dependent bone protein, is unique to bone, accounting for up to 20% of the noncollagenous proteins in adult bone28. Synthesized by mature osteoblasts, it has been described as a sensitive and specific marker of osteoblastic activity29. The OC found in serum comes from new cellular synthesis rather than from the release of bone matrix protein during bone resorption30. The serum level of intact OC reflects the rate of bone formation31,32. Our data in healthy men suggest that increased bone formation (as measured by serum OC) protects against cartilage loss in healthy subjects. It may be that once OA is established the increased bone turnover has a negative effect, as seen in the study by Bruyere, et al10.

A limitation of our study is that we included only men. Whether our findings are generalizable to women will need to be determined. The study was potentially limited by a relatively small sample size. However, the study demonstrated sufficient power to detect a significant relationship between knee cartilage volume and serum OC in the longitudinal analyses. The strength of this study is that we used a novel method for assessing knee cartilage volume in healthy asymptomatic subjects. Recent studies have shown that quantitative assessment of knee cartilage volume is reliable and reproducible, being associated with OA risk factors such as sex, age, BMI, and use of hormone replacement therapy15-17. Cartilage volume measured by MRI is significantly correlated with radiographic features of the knee OA, including joint space narrowing33, which is a commonly employed surrogate measure of articular cartilage. By the time the first changes of radiological OA are detected, 13% of knee cartilage has already been lost34. In a longitudinal study we have shown that subjects with knee OA lose 5% of their tibial cartilage per year35 and that loss of tibial cartilage correlates with worsening of symptoms36 and predicts knee replacement37. The emerging evidence suggests that there is a continuum from a normal knee to an osteoarthritic knee. This is supported by a recent study that showed that quantitative analysis of OA by MRI is feasible using T and Z scores38. A major strength of using cartilage volume is that we can examine the state of knee cartilage as a continuous variable from the normal to the prediseased to the early diseased state. We measured only tibial cartilage volume in these subjects, having previously shown that tibial and femoral cartilage volumes39 and change in tibial and femoral cartilage40 are correlated.

Although no significant associations were observed between values of serum OC or urine PYD and DPD and tibial cartilage volume, higher baseline serum OC level tended to be associated with a decreased rate of cartilage loss in healthy men. Increased bone formation may protect against tibial cartilage loss over 2 years. Further studies will be needed to understand the role of bone metabolism in the pathogenesis of knee OA.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors thank Judy Hankin for coordinating recruitment of participants for this study. We give special thanks to the participants who made this study possible.

REFERENCES

Search PubMed for:

1. Eriksen EF, Brixen K, Charles P. New markers of bone metabolism: clinical use in metabolic bone disease. Eur J Endocrinol 1995;132:251-63. [MEDLINE]

2. Gevers G, Dequeker J. Collagen and non-collagenous protein content (osteocalcin, sialoprotein, proteoglycan) in the iliac crest bone and serum osteocalcin in women with and without hand osteoarthritis. Coll Relat Res 1987;7:435-42. [MEDLINE]

3. Campion GV, Delmas PD, Dieppe PA. Serum and synovial fluid osteocalcin (bone gla protein) levels in joint disease. Br J Rheumatol 1989;28:393-8. [MEDLINE]

4. Poole AR. Immunochemical markers of joint inflammation, skeletal damage and repair: where are we now? Ann Rheum Dis 1994;53:3-5. [MEDLINE]

5. Robins SP, Stewart P, Astbury C, Bird HA. Measurement of the cross linking compound, pyridinoline, in urine as an index of collagen degradation in joint disease. Ann Rheum Dis 1986;45:969-73. [MEDLINE]

6. Seibel MJ, Duncan A, Robins SP. Urinary hydroxy-pyridinium crosslinks provide indices of cartilage and bone involvement in arthritic diseases. J Rheumatol 1989;16:964-70. [MEDLINE]

7. Thompson PW, Spector TD, James IT, Henderson E, Hart DJ. Urinary collagen crosslinks reflect the radiographic severity of knee osteoarthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1992;31:759-61. [MEDLINE]

8. MacDonald AG, McHenry P, Robins SP, Reid DM. Relationship of urinary pyridinium crosslinks to disease extent and activity in osteoarthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1994;33:16-9. [MEDLINE]

9. Astbury C, Bird HA, McLaren AM, Robins SP. Urinary excretion of pyridinium crosslinks of collagen correlated with joint damage in arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1994;33:11-5. [MEDLINE]

10. Bruyere O, Collette JH, Ethgen O, et al. Biochemical markers of bone and cartilage remodeling in prediction of longterm progression of knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2003;30:1043-50. [MEDLINE]

11. Sowers M, Lachance L, Jamadar D, et al. The associations of bone mineral density and bone turnover markers with osteoarthritis of the hand and knee in pre- and perimenopausal women. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:483-9. [MEDLINE]

12. Sittek H, Eckstein F, Gavazzeni A, et al. Assessment of normal patellar cartilage volume and thickness using MRI: an analysis of currently available pulse sequences. Skeletal Radiol 1996;25:55-62. [MEDLINE]

13. Peterfy CG, van Dijke CF, Janzen DL, et al. Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. Radiology 1994;192:485-91. [MEDLINE]

14. Pilch L, Stewart C, Gordon D, et al. Assessment of cartilage volume in the femorotibial joint with magnetic resonance imaging and 3D computer reconstruction. J Rheumatol 1994;21:2307-21. [MEDLINE]

15. Cicuttini F, Forbes A, Morris K, Darling S, Bailey M, Stuckey S. Gender differences in knee cartilage volume as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999;7:265-71. [MEDLINE]

16. Cicuttini FM, Wluka A, Bailey M, et al. Factors affecting knee cartilage volume in healthy men. Rheumatology Oxford 2003;42:258-62. [MEDLINE]

17. Wluka AE, Davis SR, Bailey M, Stuckey SL, Cicuttini FM. Users of oestrogen replacement therapy have more knee cartilage than non-users. Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:332-6. [MEDLINE]

18. Spector TD, Harris PA, Hart DJ, et al. Risk of osteoarthritis associated with long-term weight-bearing sports: a radiologic survey of the hips and knees in female ex-athletes and population controls. Arthritis Rheum 1996;39:988-95. [MEDLINE]

19. Jones G, Glisson M, Hynes K, Cicuttini F. Sex and site differences in cartilage development: a possible explanation for variations in knee osteoarthritis in later life. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:2543-9. [MEDLINE]

20. McAlindon TE, Watt I, McCrae F, Goddard P, Dieppe PA. Magnetic resonance imaging in osteoarthritis of the knee: correlation with radiographic and scintigraphic findings. Ann Rheum Dis 1991;50:14-9. [MEDLINE]

21. Garnero P, Rousseau JC, Delmas PD. Molecular basis and clinical use of biochemical markers of bone, cartilage, and synovium in joint diseases. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:953-68. [MEDLINE]

22. Graverand MP, Tron AM, Ichou M, et al. Assessment of urinary hydroxypyridinium cross-links measurement in osteoarthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1996;35:1091-5. [MEDLINE]

23. Naitou K, Kushida K, Takahashi M, Ohishi T, Inoue T. Bone mineral density and bone turnover in patients with knee osteoarthritis compared with generalized osteoarthritis. Calcif Tissue Int 2000;66:325-9. [MEDLINE]

24. Garnero P, Piperno M, Gineyts E, Christgau S, Delmas PD, Vignon E. Cross sectional evaluation of biochemical markers of bone, cartilage, and synovial tissue metabolism in patients with knee osteoarthritis: relations with disease activity and joint damage. Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:619-26. [MEDLINE]

25. Peel NF, Barrington NA, Blumsohn A, Colwell A, Hannon R, Eastell R. Bone mineral density and bone turnover in spinal osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1995;54:867-71. [MEDLINE]

26. Stewart A, Black A, Robins SP, Reid DM. Bone density and bone turnover in patients with osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. J Rheumatol 1999;26:622-6. [MEDLINE]

27. Wong PKK, Young L, Vaile JH, et al. Telopeptides as markers of bone turnover in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Intern Med J 2004;34:539-44. [MEDLINE]

28. Price PA, Parthemore JG, Deftos LJ. New biochemical marker for bone metabolism. Measurement by radioimmunoassay of bone GLA protein in the plasma of normal subjects and patients with bone disease. J Clin Invest 1980;66:878-83. [MEDLINE]

29. Garcia-Carrasco M, Gruson M, de Vernejoul MC, Denne MA, Miravet L. Osteocalcin and bone morphometric parameters in adults without bone disease. Calcif Tissue Int 1988;42:13-7. [MEDLINE]

30. Price PA, Williamson MK, Lothringer JW. Origin of the vitamin K-dependent bone protein found in plasma and its clearance by kidney and bone. J Biol Chem 1981;256:12760-6. [MEDLINE]

31. Calvo MS, Eyre DR, Gundberg CM. Molecular basis and clinical application of biological markers of bone turnover. Endocr Rev 1996;17:333-68. [MEDLINE]

32. Ebeling PR, Akesson K. Role of biochemical markers in the management of osteoporosis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2001;15:385-400. [MEDLINE]

33. Cicuttini FM, Wluka AE, Forbes A, Wolfe R. Comparison of tibial cartilage volume and radiologic grade of the tibiofemoral joint. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:682-8. [MEDLINE]

34. Jones G, Ding C, Scott F, Glisson M, Cicuttini F. Early radiographic osteoarthritis is associated with substantial changes in cartilage volume and tibial bone surface area in both males and females. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004;12:169-74. [MEDLINE]

35. Wluka AE, Stuckey S, Snaddon J, Cicuttini FM. The determinants of change in tibial cartilage volume in osteoarthritic knees. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:2065-72. [MEDLINE]

36. Wluka AE, Wolfe R, Stuckey S, Cicuttini FM. How does tibial cartilage volume relate to symptoms in subjects with knee osteoarthritis? Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:264-8. [MEDLINE]

37. Cicuttini FM, Jones G, Forbes A, Wluka AE. Rate of cartilage loss at two years predicts subsequent total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:1124-7. [MEDLINE]

38. Burgkart R, Glaser C, Hinterwimmer S, et al. Feasibility of T and Z scores from magnetic resonance imaging data for quantification of cartilage loss in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:2829-35. [MEDLINE]

39. Cicuttini FM, Wluka AE, Stuckey SL. Tibial and femoral cartilage changes in knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:977-80. [MEDLINE]

40. Cicuttini FM, Wluka AE, Wang Y, Stuckey SL. Longitudinal study of changes in tibial and femoral cartilage in knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:94-7. [MEDLINE]



Return to November 2005 Table of Contents



© 2005. The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited.
All rights reserved.