Search J Rheum

Advanced Search

Home

Current Issue

Archives

Guidelines for Authors

Classified Ads

Links

Search PubMed

Subscriptions

Subscriber Registration

Guidelines for Website Users

JRheum Update Service

Contact Info


Download PDF

View Table of Contents

Ill-defined Neurological Syndromes with Autoimmune Background: A Diagnostic Challenge

CLIO P. MAVRAGANI, NICHOLAS PATRONAS, MARINOS DALAKAS, and HARALAMPOS M. MOUTSOPOULOS

ABSTRACT.

Objective. To define the diagnostic features of a cohort of patients presenting with autoimmune manifestations and atypical neurological features not fulfilling criteria for a well defined neurological or connective tissue disorder.

Methods. Twenty-nine such patients were referred to our institution for evaluation. Nine were excluded from this study since they were diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome. The remaining 20 patients underwent complete clinical and laboratory evaluation, spinal fluid analysis, minor salivary gland biopsy (if sicca features were present), and were tested for evoked potentials. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the brain were performed in all patients and of the spine in 7.

Results. Brain and/or spinal cord MRI abnormalities were found in all 20 patients. Based on morphologic criteria and distribution, these lesions were classified into 3 subsets: (1) multiple sclerosis (MS)-like (4 patients); (2) vasculitic (8 patients); and (3) nonspecific (8 patients). The most frequent underlying abnormality in patients with subgroups 1 and 2 were the presence of homozygous methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) mutations (5 of 12, 41.6%). The most common findings among subgroup 3 were the presence of antithyroid antibodies (6 of 8 patients, 75%).

Conclusion. Homozygous MTHFR mutations are frequently encountered in patients presenting with neurological features and MS-like or vasculitic type MRI abnormalities in a setting of autoimmune disease. Nonspecific MRI changes are frequently associated with antibodies against thyroid antigens. (J Rheumatol 2007;34:341-5)

Key Indexing Terms:

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS-LIKE DISEASE
MTHFR REDUCTASE MUTATIONS

AUTOIMMUNE THYROID DISEASE
ILL-DEFINED NEUROLOGICAL SYNDROMES


From the Department of Pathophysiology, Medical School, National University of Athens, Athens, Greece; National Institutes of Health; and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

C.P. Mavragani, MD, Rheumatology Fellow, Department of Pathophysiology, Medical School, National University of Athens (current position: Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA); N. Patronas, MD, Chief, Section of Neuroradiology, National Institutes of Health; M. Dalakas, MD, Chief, Neuromuscular Diseases Section, National Institutes of Health, and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; H.M. Moutsopoulos, MD, FACP, FRCP, Professor, Chair, Department of Pathophysiology, Medical School, National University of Athens.

Address reprint requests to Dr. H.M. Moutsopoulos, Department of Pathophysiology, Medical School, National University of Athens, M. Asias 75, 11527 Athens, Greece. E-mail: hmoutsop@med.uoa.gr

Accepted for publication September 28, 2006.


Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is a recognized feature of various autoimmune disorders including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), antiphospholipid syndrome, Behçet's disease, or vasculitides. These diseases often present with similar manifestations, which can be indistinguishable from multiple sclerosis (MS), neurosarcoidosis, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection1,2. Most importantly, there is considerable overlap in the imaging presentations of these disorders, generating dilemmas in therapeutic decisions3.

We describe a cohort of patients with neurological symptoms and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities in the brain and spinal cord that did not fulfill accepted clinical or imaging criteria of MS or other well defined autoimmune or infectious CNS disorders4,5. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging studies are presented to describe this distinct subset of patients and provide insight into the pathophysiology of these ill-defined neurological syndromes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 29 consecutive patients were referred to our institution between November 2002 and May 2004 with neurological symptoms and clinical manifestations suggestive of an underlying autoimmune process. Nine patients fulfilled the criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome and were excluded6. The remaining 20 (17 women, 3 men), ranging in age from 20 to 64 years (mean 42.1), were further evaluated and represent the body of this report. All patients gave informed consent to participate.

All patients completed a validated questionnaire addressing specifically the presence of neurological syndromes (at presentation or ever) and autoimmune manifestations. In addition, laboratory evaluations were performed, consisting of routine laboratory testing; immunology profile; thrombophilia screening [C, S, antithrombin III, homocysteine, Factor VIII levels, Factor Leiden, prothrombin 20210 and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) mutations]; spinal fluid examination for determination of cell count, total protein, IgG index, detection of oligoclonal zones, and cultures (2 patients refused lumbar puncture); testing for objective oral and ocular sicca features; minor salivary gland (MSG) biopsy in the presence of sicca features (1 refused); auditory, somatosensory, and visual evoked potentials (2 patients refused); and brain MRI (all 20 patients) and spine MRI (7) using conventional T1, T2-weighted and flow attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) techniques at 1.5 Tesla. Postcontrast scans were acquired from 14 patients after intravenous administration of 0.1 mmol/kg Magnevist (Berlex, Wayne, NJ, USA).

All brain and spinal cord abnormalities were characterized according to size, distribution, signal characteristics on FLAIR and T2-weighted techniques, and enhancement on the postcontrast scans. Lesions were classified into one of the following categories: (1) MS-like changes (lesions confined to the cerebral white matter indistinguishable in appearance from demyelinating plaques); (2) vasculitic changes (lesions involving cord or cerebral gray matter); and (3) nonspecific changes (< 5 punctuate focal hyperintensities in the cerebral white matter measuring < 3 mm).

RESULTS

Table 1 summarizes pertinent clinical and laboratory abnormalities in the 20 patients. All patients had neurological signs and symptoms. Sixteen patients had clinical manifestations of autoimmune characterization, while all 20 patients were found to have various autoantibodies. No patient who underwent MSG biopsy fulfilled the criteria of Sjögren's syndrome7. Five of 18 patients had abnormal evoked potentials (Patients 5, 7, 10, 17, 19), while 4 of 18 who agreed to a lumbar puncture had abnormal findings in cerebrospinal fluid (Patients 5, 8, 12, 17). At the time of referral, erythrocyte sedimentation rate was increased in 1 patient (Patient 18), and C-reactive protein concentrations were above the normal limits in 2 patients (Patients 4, 15). Thrombophilia screening revealed that 12 of 20 patients (60%) had MTHFR mutations, 7 homozygous (35%) and 5 heterozygous (25%). Two patients had increased Factor VIII levels, while 1 patient had low protein C levels.

Table 1. Main clinical and laboratory features in 20 patients.

MRI studies revealed brain abnormalities in 18 of 20 patients. The brain lesions detected were of high signal intensities on FLAIR and T2-weighted scans and measured < 10 mm diameter. The majority of the lesions were in the white matter of the cerebral hemispheres, but in 2 patients cortical and deep gray matter was also affected. The cerebellum and brain stem were normal in all patients. On the postcontrast scans, 2 patients demonstrated abnormal enhancement.

Cervical cord lesions were identified in 7 patients. They were similar in appearance to the brain abnormalities, demonstrating high signal intensities on T2-weighted scans, and involved both gray and white matter. Two patients with cord lesions had normal brain results.

According to the MRI classification criteria, 4 patients were classified in the MS-like group, characterized by the presence of cerebral white matter ranging in numbers from 6 to more than 50 (Group I). None of these patients met the criteria of MS4 (Figure 1A). Vasculitic lesions were found in 8 patients (Group II; Figure 1B, 1C), while in the remaining 8 of the 20 patients fewer than 5 small punctate lesions were found in the cerebral white matter (Group III; Figure 1D). When MRI abnormalities were analyzed with respect to the underlying thrombophilia and immunology profiles, the following observations were made. MTHFR mutations were found in 3 of the 4 patients in Group I, 6 of 8 patients in Group II, and 3 of the 8 patients in Group III. Interestingly, in Groups I and II, the prevalence of homozygotes for MTHFR was increased by 4-fold compared to the reported prevalence8 in healthy Greek subjects (41% vs 10%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Antithyroid antibodies were encountered in 6 of 8 patients in Group III and in one of the 4 patients in Group I.

A 2006-50.fig.1a.gif B 2006-50.fig.1c.gif
C 2006-50.fig.1b.gif D 2006-50.fig.1d.gif
[click, then close, image]
Figure 1. A. MS-like lesions: axial FLAIR MRI scan of brain reveals multiple focal hyperintense lesions in the white matter of both cerebral hemispheres. Similar abnormalities were also present in other tomographic sections (not shown). B and C. Vasculitic lesions: (B) Sagittal T2-weighted image of the cervical spine shows an abnormal area of increased signal intensity in the proximal cervical cord involving both gray and white matter (arrow). (C) Axial T2-weighted image of brain of the same patient. There are 2 small-vessel ischemic lesions in the left globus pallidus and in the right thalamus (arrows). D. Nonspecific brain lesions: axial FLAIR image of the brain reveals 2 punctate lesions of abnormal increased signal in white matter of the right frontal lobe (arrow).

DISCUSSION

We have described a group of patients with underlying autoimmunity and neurological manifestations mimicking MS. All patients had MRI brain and/or spinal cord abnormalities involving white or gray matter or combination of both. Thrombophilic conditions such as antiphospholipid syndrome can mimic MS2, but whether inherited thrombophilic conditions can also be responsible for MS-like disease has not been investigated. The high incidence of MTHFR mutations that was encountered in the subgroups of patients with MS-like and vasculitic lesions suggests that the thrombogenic effects of this mutation play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of the lesions. MTHFR gene homozygosity (TT genotype) is the most common cause of genetically determined homocysteinemia in the general population and is associated with silent white matter lesions9. Of relevance to this is the recent observation that the prevalence of MTHFR mutations follows the same pattern as the incidence of MS from the Equator to the hemispheres10. Along with the observation that patients with MS have increased levels of homocysteine11, this suggests that a number of atypical "MS cases" that do not fulfill the typical MS criteria may represent vasculopathy due to MTHFR mutations. Even though the number of our patients was small, the high prevalence of MTHFR mutations should prompt physicians to screen such patients for an underlying genetic thrombophilic disorder, because the treatment required is different from immunotherapy.

The clustering of thrombogenic MTHFR mutations in a population with vasculitic/MS-like features on MRI in a setting of autoimmune background was surprising and intriguing. In support of this, increasing evidence suggests high prevalence of MTHFR mutations as well as increased homocysteine levels in populations with autoimmune disease such as SLE12,13. Taken together, our findings may reveal novel genetic associations in patients with autoimmune disorders that have not yet been studied extensively.

The observation that there was increased association of the nonspecific MRI abnormalities with antibodies against thyroid antigens in Group III is also of interest. Such lesions by themselves are of unclear significance and have been found in asymptomatic patients, especially the elderly, and in patients with vascular risk factors14. The mean age of our patients with these changes, however, was less than 50 years, suggesting that aging alone does not account for these abnormalities. It is therefore tempting to propose that in our patients these findings are not epiphenomena, but rather represent the earliest signs of a thyroid-related autoimmune disorder15.

We conclude that in addition to the standard diagnostic investigations, patients with MS-like clinical manifestations and MRI lesions in the CNS should be carefully evaluated for the presence of MTHFR mutations and antibodies to thyroid antigens. Such information may prove valuable for optimal therapeutic strategies and longterm management.

REFERENCES

Search PubMed for:

1. Trojano M, Paolicelli D. The differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: classification and clinical features of relapsing and progressive neurological syndromes. Neurol Sci 2001;22 Suppl 2:S98-102.

2. Cuadrado MJ, Khamashta MA, Ballesteros A, Godfrey T, Simon MJ, Hughes GRV. Can neurologic manifestations of Hughes (antiphospholipid) syndrome be distinguished from multiple sclerosis? Analysis of 27 patients and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2000;79:57-68. [MEDLINE]

3. Arnold DL, Matthews PM. MRI in the diagnosis and management of multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2002;58 Suppl 4:S23-31.

4. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001;50:121-7. [MEDLINE]

5. Klippel JH, Stone JH, Crofford I. Primer on the rheumatic diseases. 12th ed. Atlanta: The Arthritis Foundation; 2001.

6. Wilson WA, Gharavi AE, Koike T, et al. International consensus statement on preliminary classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome: report of an international workshop. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:1309-11. [MEDLINE]

7. Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Jonsson R, et al. European Study Group on Classification Criteria for Sjogren's Syndrome. Classification criteria for Sjogren's syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group. Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61:554-8. [MEDLINE]

8. Zalavras CG, Giotopoulou S, Dokou E, et al. Lack of association between the C677T mutation in the 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene and venous thromboembolism in Northwestern Greece. Int Angiol 2002;21:268-71. [MEDLINE]

9. Kohara K, Fujisawa M, Ando F, et al. MTHFR gene polymorphism as a risk factor for silent brain infarcts and white matter lesions in the Japanese general population: The NILS-LSA Study. Stroke 2003;34:1130-5. Epub 2003 Apr 10. [MEDLINE]

10. Adjalla CE, Amouzou EK, Sanni A, et al. Low frequency of mutated methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677C–T and 1298A–C genetics single nucleotide polymorphisms in Sub-Saharan populations. Clin Chem Lab Med 2003;41:1028-32. [MEDLINE]

11. Vrethem M, Mattsson E, Hebelka H, et al. Increased plasma homocysteine levels without signs of vitamin B12 deficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis assessed by blood and cerebrospinal fluid homocysteine and methylmalonic acid. Mult Scler 2003;9:239-45. [MEDLINE]

12. Afeltra A, Vadacca M, Conti L, et al. Thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: congenital and acquired risk factors. Arthritis Rheum 2005;53:452-9. [MEDLINE]

13. Petri M, Roubenoff R, Dallal GE, Nadeau MR, Selhub J, Rosenberg IH. Plasma homocysteine as a risk factor for atherothrombotic events in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet 1996;348:1120-4. [MEDLINE]

14. Awad IA, Spetzler RF, Hodak JA, Awad CA, Carey R. Incidental subcortical lesions identified on magnetic resonance imaging in the elderly. I. Correlation with age and cerebrovascular risk factors. Stroke 1986;17:1084-9. [MEDLINE]

15. Chong JY, Rowland LP, Utiger RD. Hashimoto encephalopathy: syndrome or myth? Arch Neurol 2003;60:164-71.[MEDLINE]



Return to February 2007 Table of Contents



© 2007. The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited. All rights reserved.