Search J Rheum

Advanced Search

Home

Current Issue

Archives

Guidelines for Authors

Classified Ads

Links

Search PubMed

Subscriptions

Subscriber Registration

Guidelines for Website Users

JRheum Update Service

Contact Info


Download PDF

View Table of Contents

Increased Serum Soluble CD40 Levels in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis

KAZUHIRO KOMURA, MANABU FUJIMOTO, TAKASHI MATSUSHITA, KOICHI YANABA, MASANARI KODERA, AYAKO KAWASUJI, MINORU HASEGAWA, KAZUHIKO TAKEHARA, and SHINICHI SATO

ABSTRACT.

Objective. To determine serum levels of soluble CD40 (sCD40) and clinical association in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

Methods. Serum sCD40 levels were examined by ELISA in 49 patients with SSc, 15 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, and 26 healthy individuals. sCD40 levels in plasma samples, which were obtained at the same time, were also determined. SSc patients were grouped into 22 patients with limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) and 27 patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc).

Results. There was no significant difference between sCD40 levels of sera and those of plasma. Serum sCD40 levels were significantly elevated in patients with SSc compared to patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and controls (p < 0.001). Serum sCD40 levels were higher in patients with lcSSc than in those with dcSSc (p < 0.001). There was no correlation between sCD40 and sCD40 ligand levels in patients with SSc.

Conclusion. Elevated serum sCD40 levels were associated with lcSSc. These results suggest that the blockade of CD40/CD40 ligand interaction could be a potential therapeutic strategy in SSc. (First Release Jan 15 2007; J Rheumatol 2007;34:353–8)

Key Indexing Terms:

SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS
CD40
SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS


From the Department of Dermatology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Ishikawa; and the Department of Dermatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.

Supported by a grant-in-aid from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan.

K. Komura, MD, PhD; M. Fujimoto, MD; T. Matsushita, MD; K. Yanaba, MD, PhD; M. Kodera, MD, PhD; A. Kawasuji, MD; M. Hasegawa, MD, PhD; K. Takehara, MD, PhD, Department of Dermatology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science; S. Sato, MD, PhD, Department of Dermatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences.

Address reprint requests to Dr. M. Fujimoto, Department of Dermatology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8641, Japan. E-mail address: fujimoto-m@umin.ac.jp

Accepted for publication October 30, 2006.


Interaction between CD40 and CD40 ligand (CD40L, CD154) is essential for humoral and cellular immune response1. CD40 is a 50-kDa type I transmembrane protein that belongs to the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily. CD40 is expressed on the surface of immune cells including B cells, dendritic cells, and monocytes/macrophages1, as well as other cell types, including endothelial cells2 and fibroblasts3. CD40 signaling triggered by CD40L regulates various functions including B cell survival, immunoglobulin (Ig) class switching, and cytokine production1. CD40/CD40L interactions are likely to play a significant role in the development of autoimmune diseases4. Increased expression of CD40L has been detected on T and B cells from patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)5,6. An increased serum level of soluble CD40L has been also reported in various collagen diseases such as SLE7,8, systemic sclerosis (SSc)9,10, and rheumatoid arthritis11. Further, autoantibody to CD40L has been demonstrated in SLE12. Therefore, CD40/CD40L interaction is an attractive therapeutic target in autoimmune diseases, and anti-CD40L monoclonal antibodies (Ab) have been used in clinical trials13,14.

SSc is a connective tissue disease characterized by excessive extracellular matrix deposition in the skin and other visceral organs. The presence of autoantibodies is a central feature of SSc since > 90% of patients with SSc have autoantibodies reacting with intracellular components, such as DNA topoisomerase I (topo I), centromere, and RNA polymerases. Furthermore, patients with SSc exhibit hyper-g-globulinemia, polyclonal B cell hyperactivity, skewed B cell phenotype, and altered B cell homeostasis characterized by expanded naive B cells and activated but diminished memory B cells15. Although the etiology of SSc remains unknown, these B cell abnormalities may be related to the disease development16,17, in which CD40 may have an important role. For example, anti-topo I Ab production is dependent on CD40-CD40L interaction18. Increased expression of CD40L in activated CD4+ T cells19 as well as increased circulating soluble CD40L concentrations have been detected in patients with SSc9. Roles of CD40 in SSc are intriguing since CD40 is expressed not only in B cells but also in fibroblasts and endothelial cells2,3. Indeed, CD40 expression is augmented on SSc fibroblasts compared to normal fibroblasts20. Collectively, CD40 possibly regulates various aspects of the pathogenesis in SSc.

The soluble form of CD40 (sCD40), which can interfere with CD40-CD40L interaction, is produced by shedding from CD40-expressing cells21. While circulating sCD40 levels are reported to be elevated in patients with chronic renal failure, chronic liver diseases, and Alzheimer disease22-25, the prevalence and clinical significance of sCD40 in autoimmune diseases have not been clarified. We measured the levels of sCD40 in sera from patients with SSc as well as patients with other autoimmune diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Serum samples. Serum samples were obtained from 49 Japanese patients with SSc (44 female and 5 male). All patients fulfilled the criteria for SSc proposed by the American College of Rheumatology26. These patients were 2–76 years old (mean age 50). They were grouped according to the classification system proposed by LeRoy, et al27: 22 patients (all female) had limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) and 27 patients (22 female and 5 male) diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc). The disease duration of patients with lcSSc and dcSSc was 9.9 ± 9.6 and 3.1 ± 3.4 years, respectively. Five patients had been treated with low-dose corticosteroids (prednisolone, 5–20 mg/day) and 4 patients with low dose D-penicillamine (100–500 mg/day) at the first visit. No patient with SSc had received immunosuppressive therapy, or had a recent history of infection or other inflammatory diseases. All patients with SSc except one were treated with antiplatelet agents, such as aspirin and/or prostaglandin I2. As a disease control, we also examined serum samples from 15 patients with SLE that fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology criteria28. SLE patients with more than 10 SLE Disease Activity Index points were included in this study. Since patients with reduced renal function were reported to have elevated sCD40 levels, SLE patients with renal involvement were excluded in this study. No patient with SLE was treated with antiplatelet agents. Twenty-six healthy Japanese persons (23 female and 3 male) were used as controls. Controls were 7–70 years old (mean age 46).

For a retrospective longitudinal study, patients whose serum samples were taken more than 3 times were analyzed. They included 65 serum samples from 16 patients with SSc (all female) out of 49. These patients were classified into 8 patients with lcSSc and 8 with dcSSc. They were 9–71 years old (mean age 54). Their disease duration at their first visit was 2.2 ± 3.4 years. These patients had been followed up for 3.6 ± 1.5 years (1.3–5.8 yrs) with 4.1 ± 1.0 (3–6) different timepoints. At the first visit, none had been treated with corticosteroids or D-penicillamine. All 8 patients with dcSSc received low-dose corticosteroids (prednisolone, 5–20 mg/day), and one received low-dose D-penicillamine (100 mg/day) after the first visit. Treatment with corticosteroids or D-penicillamine was not started in any patients with lcSSc, and no patient with SSc received immunosuppressive therapy throughout the followup period. Peripheral venous blood sample was drawn into pyogen-free blood collection tubes without additives, immediately immersed in melting ice, and allowed to clot one hour before centrifugation (1,500 g at 4°C for 10 minutes). All samples were stored at –70°C prior to use.

Plasma samples. Serum and plasma samples were simultaneously obtained from 8 patients with SSc, 3 with SLE, and 5 controls. The EDTA-treated blood samples were immediately immersed in melting ice and centrifuged at low speed (300 g at 4°C for 5 minutes), and the plasma fraction was recovered. The plasma samples were then centrifuged again (1,000 g at 4°C for 30 min). All samples were stored at –70°C prior to use.

Clinical assessment. Complete medical histories, physical examinations, and laboratory tests were conducted for all patients at the first visit, with limited evaluations during followup visits. Skin score was measured by the scoring technique of the modified Rodnan total skin thickness score (TSS)29. Organ system involvement was defined as described previously: lung = bibasilar fibrosis on chest radiography and high resolution computed tomography; esophagus = hypomotility shown by barium radiography; joint = inflammatory polyarthralgias or arthritis; heart = pericarditis, congestive heart failure, or arrhythmias requiring treatment; kidney = malignant hypertension and rapidly progressive renal failure without any other explanation; and muscle = proximal muscle weakness and elevated serum creatine kinase. The protocol was approved by the Kanazawa University School of Medicine and Kanazawa University Hospital.

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Specific ELISA kits were used for measuring serum sCD40 levels (Medsystems Diagnostics, Vienna, Austria), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Each sample was tested in duplicate. Levels of anticentromere or anti-topo I Abs were assessed using specific ELISA (Medical & Biological Laboratories, Nagoya, Japan).

Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U-test for comparison of sCD40 levels, Fisher's exact probability test for comparison of frequencies, and Bonferroni's test for multiple comparisons. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to examine the relationship between 2 continuous variables. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All data are shown as means ± standard deviation (SD). In the longitudinal study, it was difficult to separate into clusters of each disease subset and conduct cluster analysis.

RESULTS

Comparison of sCD40 levels between serum and plasma samples. In several soluble factors, serum levels do not reflect their synthesis by peripheral tissues, and they are not representative of circulating levels at the time of sampling. Moreover, platelets constitutively express CD40. Therefore, first we determined sCD40 levels in serum samples and plasma samples, which were obtained simultaneously (Figure 1). In patients with SSc, sCD40 levels in plasma were slightly higher than those in sera, although there was no statistical difference (Figure 1). sCD40 levels in controls and those in SLE were similar between serum and plasma samples. The results suggest that elevated serum and plasma sCD40 levels in patients with SSc were not reflected by platelet releasing during sampling.

2005-775.fig.1.gif
[click, then close, image]
Figure 1. Serum and plasma levels of sCD40 in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and controls. Serum sCD40 levels were determined by a specific ELISA. Short bar indicates the mean value in each group.

Serum sCD40 levels were elevated in patients with SSc. Then we assessed sCD40 levels using preserved serum samples from patients with SSc. Serum sCD40 levels were significantly higher in patients with SSc than in controls (p < 0.001) and patients with SLE (p < 0.001, Figure 2). Concerning subgroups of SSc, sCD40 levels were significantly elevated in patients with lcSSc compared with those with dcSSc (p < 0.001). By contrast, serum sCD40 levels were similar between patients with SLE and controls. While the expression of CD40 has been reported to increase with some cancers, including leukemias, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and lung cancer30,31, no patient with SSc in this study had malignant diseases.

2005-775.fig.2.gif
[click, then close, image]
Figure 2. Serum levels of sCD40 in patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc), limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc), or SLE and controls at the first evaluation. Serum sCD40 levels were determined by a specific ELISA. Short bar indicates the mean value in each group. Broken line indicates the cutoff value (mean + 3 SD of the control samples).

When values higher than the mean + 3 SD (34.1 ng/ml) of the control serum samples were considered to be elevated in this study, sCD40 levels were elevated in 80% (39/49) of patients with SSc. Elevated sCD40 levels were found in 95% (21/22) of patients with lcSSc, significantly more frequently than in patients with dcSSc (18/27, 66%; p < 0.05). Accordingly, sCD40 levels were elevated in patients with lower TSS (p < 0.05, Table 1). Further, sCD40 levels correlated negatively with TSS at the first evaluation (r = –0.458, p < 0.03, Figure 3A). TSS in patients with normal sCD40 levels was significantly higher than those with elevated sCD40 levels (p < 0.03, Figure 3B). In addition, SSc patients with elevated sCD40 levels had less frequency of diffuse pigmentation than those with normal sCD40 levels (p < 0.05). One patient with renal failure showed elevated sCD40 level (Table 1). Nonetheless, there was no statistical difference between renal function and sCD40 levels, since almost all patients with SSc had normal renal function. By contrast, sCD40 levels did not significantly correlate with serum levels of anti-topo I Abs by ELISA, anticentromere antibodies by ELISA, IgG, IgA, IgM, CH50, C3, C4, C-reactive protein, or erythrocyte sedimentation rates (Table 1 and data not shown). Serum levels of sCD40 did not correlate with serum sCD40L levels, which were also elevated in patients with SSc (Table 1)9. Collectively, elevated sCD40 levels were associated with lcSSc.

Table 1. Clinical and laboratory features of patients with SSc showing elevated serum sCD40 levels. Unless noted otherwise, values are percentages.

 

2005-775.fig.3.gif
[click, then close, image]
Figure 3. A. The correlation of total skin thickness score (TSS) against serum levels of sCD40 in patients with SSc at the first evaluation. Serum sCD40 levels were determined by a specific ELISA. TSS = modified Rodnan TSS. B. TSS in patients with normal sCD40 levels or elevated sCD40 levels. *p < 0.05.

A longitudinal study of sCD40 levels. To assess changes in serum sCD40 levels over time, 65 serum samples from 16 patients with SSc were analyzed (Figure 4). At the first visit, no patient had been treated with corticosteroids or D-penicillamine. Six of 8 dcSSc patients with elevated sCD40 levels at their first visit had stable or slightly decreased levels during the followup period. The remaining 2 patients with dcSSc had normal sCD40 levels at their first visit. In one of those patients sCD40 level was stable within normal range during the followup. The other showed temporal elevation, which returned to the normal range after 3 years' followup. Nonetheless, there was no clinical difference between patients showing stable or slightly increased sCD40 levels and a patient showing decreased sCD40 levels during the followup. All 7 patients with lcSSc showed elevated sCD40 levels at their first visit. Five of 7 patients with lcSSc showed gradually elevated sCD40 levels during followup, while 2 showed stable sCD40 levels. There was no clinical and therapeutic difference. No patient with lcSSc received steroids or D-penicillamine or had worsening skin sclerosis, or developed new organ involvement during the observation period.

2005-775.fig.4.gif
[click, then close, image]
Figure 4. Serial changes of serum sCD40 levels during the followup period in patients with dcSSc (A) and those with lcSSc (B). Serum sCD40 levels were determined by a specific ELISA.

DISCUSSION

While circulating sCD40 can modulate CD40/CD40L interaction in immune response or may at least reflect abnormal CD40 regulation, sCD40 levels had not been assessed in collagen diseases. Our results show that serum sCD40 levels were specifically elevated in patients with SSc. In particular, sCD40 levels were significantly elevated in patients with lcSSc compared to those with dcSSc. In longitudinal studies, several patients with lcSSc showed gradually elevated sCD40 levels without worsening skin sclerosis or new organ involvement during followup (data not shown). Together with the fact that anti-CD40L monoclonal Ab appears effective in some autoimmune diseases, these results suggest that the persistent elevation of serum sCD40 levels plays a protective role from the progression of SSc.

In our study, serum levels of sCD40 did not correlate with serum sCD40L levels. Furthermore, longitudinal analysis of sCD40 in patients with SSc in our study contrasts with that of sCD40L levels we demonstrated previously9. As for sCD40L levels, patients with dcSSc exhibited persistent elevations, while those with lcSSc showed temporary elevations at the early timepoints. These results suggest that sCD40 and sCD40L levels are regulated independently. Since CD40L expression is augmented in activated T cells from patients with SSc19, the interaction between CD40L on T cells and CD40 on fibroblasts/endothelial cells may contribute to pathogenesis in SSc. In this process, sCD40L may trigger CD40 signaling pathway, while sCD40 may play an antagonistic role, which may be a similar function of anti-CD40L Ab.

sCD40 is produced through cleavage from CD40-expressing cells21. High concentration of sCD40 in patients with chronic renal failure who are on dialysis22,23 suggests that circulating sCD40 is constitutively produced and that the level is tightly regulated. In addition, since CD40 engagement is shown to induce sCD40 release, CD40 activation may also contribute to the elevated sCD40 levels. Thus, increased sCD40 in SSc is likely to result from increased expression and/or activation of CD40 on B cells, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells. Increased CD40 expression in SSc fibroblasts has been demonstrated20, although the results that patients with lcSSc had higher levels of sCD40 may lead to the speculation that the major source is not fibroblasts. The CD40 pathway, especially in B cells and/or endothelial cells, may be more strongly activated in lcSSc than in dcSSc. Alternatively, considering that CD40 engagement downregulates cell-surface CD40 expression at the same time21, sCD40 release may be suppressed when CD40 pathway is activated too strongly. If this is the case, it may partly explain normal serum sCD40 levels in patients with active SLE as well as in those with dcSSc in our study.

CD40/CD40L interaction appears to play important roles in the pathogenesis of SSc. CD40L transgenic mice in which CD40L overexpression is seen on the basal keratinocytes of epidermis develop skin fibrosis and inflammation in skin and lung in addition to antinuclear Ab production32. Blockade of CD40L by anti-CD40L Ab prevented increased collagen deposition in the lungs during hapten-induced intestinal fibrosis33 and in vitro anti-topo I Ab production in cultured T and B cells from patients with SSc18. Collectively, the CD40/CD40L-signal blockade may be a potential strategy for the therapy of SSc as well. Our results suggest that sCD40 levels were elevated in a milder subset of SSc in comparison to a severe subset. Therefore, plenty of sCD40, which can block CD40/CD40L interactions, may prevent the development of SSc, although further studies are needed. Since anti-CD40L monoclonal Ab therapy has caused several complications34, administration of sCD40 may be a potential alternative strategy for treating autoimmune diseases in which CD40/CD40L interaction may play a role.

REFERENCES

Search PubMed for:

1. Quezada SA, Jarvinen LZ, Lind EF, Noelle RJ. CD40/CD154 interactions at the interface of tolerance and immunity. Annu Rev Immunol 2004;22:307-28. [MEDLINE]

2. Karmann K, Hughes CC, Schechner J, Fanslow WC, Pober JS. CD40 on human endothelial cells: inducibility by cytokines and functional regulation of adhesion molecule expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:4342-6. [MEDLINE]

3. Fries KM, Sempowski GD, Gaspari AA, Blieden T, Looney RJ, Phipps RP. CD40 expression by human fibroblasts. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1995;77:42-51. [MEDLINE]

4. Flavell RA. The relationship of inflammation and initiation of autoimmune disease: role of TNF super family members. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2002;266:1-9. [MEDLINE]

5. Desai-Mehta A, Lu L, Ramsey-Goldman R, Datta SK. Hyperexpression of CD40 ligand by B and T cells in human lupus and its role in pathogenic autoantibody production. J Clin Invest 1996;97:2063-73. [MEDLINE]

6. Koshy M, Berger D, Crow MK. Increased expression of CD40 ligand on systemic lupus erythematosus lymphocytes. J Clin Invest 1996;98:826-37. [MEDLINE]

7. Kato K, Santana-Sahagun E, Rassenti LZ, et al. The soluble CD40 ligand sCD154 in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Invest 1999;104:947-55. [MEDLINE]

8. Vakkalanka RK, Woo C, Kirou KA, Koshy M, Berger D, Crow MK. Elevated levels and functional capacity of soluble CD40 ligand in systemic lupus erythematosus sera. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:871-81. [MEDLINE]

9. Komura K, Sato S, Hasegawa M, Fujimoto M, Takehara K. Elevated circulating CD40L concentrations in patients with systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 2004;31:514-9. [MEDLINE]

10. Allanore Y, Borderie D, Meune C, et al. Increased plasma soluble CD40 ligand concentrations in systemic sclerosis and association with pulmonary arterial hypertension and digital ulcers. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:481-3. [MEDLINE]

11. Tamura N, Kobayashi S, Kato K, et al. Soluble CD154 in rheumatoid arthritis: elevated plasma levels in cases with vasculitis. J Rheumatol 2001;28:2583-90. [MEDLINE]

12. Nakamura M, Tanaka Y, Satoh T, et al. Autoantibody to CD40 ligand in systemic lupus erythematosus: association with thrombocytopenia but not thromboembolism. Rheumatology Oxford 2006;45:150-6. [MEDLINE]

13. Kalunian KC, Davis JC Jr, Merrill JT, Totoritis MC, Wofsy D. Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus by inhibition of T cell costimulation with anti-CD154: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:3251-8. [MEDLINE]

14. Boumpas DT, Furie R, Manzi S, et al. A short course of BG9588 (anti-CD40 ligand antibody) improves serologic activity and decreases hematuria in patients with proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:719-27. [MEDLINE]

15. Sato S, Fujimoto M, Hasegawa M, Takehara K. Altered blood B lymphocyte homeostasis in systemic sclerosis: expanded naive B cells and diminished but activated memory B cells. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:1918-27. [MEDLINE]

16. Sato S, Fujimoto M, Hasegawa M, Takehara K, Tedder TF. Altered B lymphocyte function induces systemic autoimmunity in systemic sclerosis. Mol Immunol 2005;42:821-31. [MEDLINE]

17. Fujimoto M, Sato S. B lymphocytes and systemic sclerosis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2005;17:746-51. [MEDLINE]

18. Kuwana M, Medsger TA Jr, Wright TM. T and B cell collaboration is essential for the autoantibody response to DNA topoisomerase I in systemic sclerosis. J Immunol 1995;155:2703-14. [MEDLINE]

19. Valentini G, Romano MF, Naclerio C, et al. Increased expression of CD40 ligand in activated CD4+ T lymphocytes of systemic sclerosis patients. J Autoimmun 2000;15:61-6. [MEDLINE]

20. Fukasawa C, Kawaguchi Y, Harigai M, et al. Increased CD40 expression in skin fibroblasts from patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc): role of CD40-CD154 in the phenotype of SSc fibroblasts. Eur J Immunol 2003;33:2792-800. [MEDLINE]

21. Contin C, Pitard V, Itai T, Nagata S, Moreau JF, Dechanet-Merville J. Membrane-anchored CD40 is processed by the tumor necrosis factor-alpha-converting enzyme. Implications for CD40 signaling. J Biol Chem 2003;278:32801-9. [MEDLINE]

22. Schwabe RF, Engelmann H, Hess S, Fricke H. Soluble CD40 in the serum of healthy donors, patients with chronic renal failure, haemodialysis and chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. Clin Exp Immunol 1999;117:153-8. [MEDLINE]

23. Contin C, Pitard V, Delmas Y, et al. Potential role of soluble CD40 in the humoral immune response impairment of uraemic patients. Immunology 2003;110:131-40. [MEDLINE]

24. Schmilovitz-Weiss H, Belinki A, Pappo O, et al. Role of circulating soluble CD40 as an apoptotic marker in liver disease. Apoptosis 2004;9:205-10. [MEDLINE]

25. Mocali A, Cedrola S, Della Malva N, et al. Increased plasma levels of soluble CD40, together with the decrease of TGF beta 1, as possible differential markers of Alzheimer disease. Exp Gerontol 2004;39:1555-61. [MEDLINE]

26. Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Subcommittee for scleroderma criteria of the American Rheumatism Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:581-90. [MEDLINE]

27. LeRoy EC, Black C, Fleischmajer R, et al. Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): classification, subsets and pathogenesis. J Rheumatol 1988;15:202-5. [MEDLINE]

28. Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, et al. The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1982;25:1271-7. [MEDLINE]

29. Clements PJ, Lachenbruch PA, Seibold JR, et al. Skin thickness score in systemic sclerosis: an assessment of interobserver variability in 3 independent studies. J Rheumatol 1993;20:1892-6. [MEDLINE]

30. Planken EV, Willemze R, Kluin-Nelemans JC. The role of the CD40 antigen on malignant B cells. Leuk Lymphoma 1996;22:229-35. [MEDLINE]

31. Sabel MS, Yamada M, Kawaguchi Y, Chen FA, Takita H, Bankert RB. CD40 expression on human lung cancer correlates with metastatic spread. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2000;49:101-8. [MEDLINE]

32. Mehling A, Loser K, Varga G, et al. Overexpression of CD40 ligand in murine epidermis results in chronic skin inflammation and systemic autoimmunity. J Exp Med 2001;194:615-28. [MEDLINE]

33. Zhang-Hoover J, Sutton A, Stein-Streilein J. CD40/CD40 ligand interactions are critical for elicitation of autoimmune-mediated fibrosis in the lung. J Immunol 2001;166:3556-63. [MEDLINE]

34. Kawai T, Andrews D, Colvin RB, Sachs DH, Cosimi AB. Thromboembolic complications after treatment with monoclonal antibody against CD40 ligand. Nat Med 2000;6:114. [MEDLINE]



Return to February 2007 Table of Contents



© 2007. The Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited. All rights reserved.